Athens-------APEX =)
A direct democracy
In the general context of "government," something true and important about the ancient Athenian government is that, during the Classical Period in Greece, it was organized as a democracy. While it was not a "pure" democracy, since only relatively few citizens were able to vote and hold public office, it was nonetheless the first appearance of democracy in Western Civilization.
pure democracy
A democracy.
Europe's old form of Government was the Monarchy, but most of them today are democracy
pure democracy
because the republicanism is better than pure democracy
Because a pure democracy leads to a dictatorship. Rather, a democracy based on limited government would allow everyone's rights to be respected. For example, in a pure democracy the minority (49.9999%) is subjected to the majority (50% plus 1) for example, in a pure democracy all the right-handed people could call for anyone left-handed to be executed and there would be nothing that the left-handed people could do to stop it. But with limited government, the government would be denied the right to execute people based on such silly things.
The most common type of government worldwide is democracy, where the people have a say in decision-making through elected representatives. There are different forms of democracy, such as representative democracy and direct democracy, depending on how the government is structured.
Ancient Athens is often considered to have had one of the most direct forms of democracy in history. In Athens, citizens had the opportunity to vote on laws and policies directly in large assemblies. Their system of government allowed for more widespread citizen participation compared to other ancient civilizations.
The Greeks introduced democracy .
James Madison defined pure democracy as a system in which decisions are made directly by all eligible citizens, without the mediation of elected representatives. He believed that pure democracies could lead to the tyranny of the majority and were prone to chaos, which is why he favored a republican form of government with checks and balances.
Democracy means "rule by the people". Republic means "rule by elected officials". Since the officials in a republic are elected, it is a form of democracy. Not all democracies are republics (direct democracy is not), and not all "republics" are actually democracies ("Islamic republics", for example). The United States is a republic and representational democracy.
India is the world's most populace democracy.
I see no reason to believe that Imperialism would be a stepping stone to democracy. Democratic ideals do not rely on significant land mass or population. Actually a smaller population and area is more suitable to a pure democracy. In a pure democracy every individual has a say in the government. Every law or change in government is voted on by the entire population. If you are referring to a Democratic-Republic (United States type of government) then the expansion of the nation did not hinder the government but has not helped it either. In most cases rapid expansion from imperialsim only adds to the strain on any government, making it difficult to enforce national policy.
The US is a Constitutional Republic. It differs from a "pure" democracy in that voters do not vote on every issue, but elect people to represent them.
You may be wondering exactly what Direct Democracy is and how it works. Direct Democracy is a form of government that is said to be by the people, but also for the people. It is a type of government that the people will make the decisions for themselves rather than to have the decisions made by representatives. Another term used to describe Direct Democracy is pure democracy or "true" democracy.