0
Because a pure democracy leads to a Dictatorship. Rather, a democracy based on limited government would allow everyone's rights to be respected. For example, in a pure democracy the minority (49.9999%) is subjected to the majority (50% plus 1) for example, in a pure democracy all the right-handed people could call for anyone left-handed to be executed and there would be nothing that the left-handed people could do to stop it. But with limited government, the government would be denied the right to execute people based on such silly things.
What else can I help you with?
Why did the founding fathers establish a republic?
In a republican form of government, elected representatives are responsible for the government operation and are also responsible to those citizens who elected them. The Founding Fathers did not establish a pure democracy within the Constitution of the United States. They provided for indirect democracy, or, a republic. The Founding Fathers were classical conservatives. They believed that democratic ideals would best be obtained by a governenment that was not dependent upon the daily whims of the population. The people would best be served by electing representatives who would uphold the framework of government set down in the Constitution.
How did the founding fathers protect against unlimited democracy?
The American Founders established protective measures against the 'paradox of democracy' in this general way: they founded the United States of America as a republic rather than a full-fledged democracy. By doing so, they prevented any 'tyranny of the majority' from directly using governmental power to oppress the nation as a whole while also ensuring slow, orderly change (if change should be desired) in American government, among other protective measures.
How do the people rule in a pure democracy?
A Pure-Democracy is where the people legitimately do everything. if there is a vote for a leader or change in government the people go out with a vote and the votes of every person in the entire country are tailed up and whoever has more wins.
The framers of the constitution understood democracy and republic to mean different things Explain this difference and identify which concept the framers favored?
The Founders of the United States strongly favored republican government over democracy for a variety of reasons. Fundamentally, however, they were suspicious of pure 'rule by the people' (which is democracy) because of its instability and difficulty alike; they deliberately chose instead to establish America as a republic, which combines some features of democracy with parliamentarian (and oligarchic) government for the sake of a 'representative democracy.'
Who was the founding father of the Soviet Union?
The founding father of the Soviet Union was V.I LENIN the leader of the Bolsheviks.After the revolution the territories on China and eastern Europe that was conquered by the Russian Empire during WWI was given back and from the Empire emerged 13 sub-national states.Lenin united the 12 of them to form the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics with Mongolia being independent but an ideological ally of the USSR.After the formation 13 Communist parties formed for each state with its own parliament.After Lenin's death Stalin ruled the USSR with an Iron fist hunting down most of thew founding fathers and many other Communists changing the USSR from a Soviet Democracy into a fortress state.After Stalin rule the USSR would never return to its pure routes.
Why did the founding fathers establish a republic?
In a republican form of government, elected representatives are responsible for the government operation and are also responsible to those citizens who elected them. The Founding Fathers did not establish a pure democracy within the Constitution of the United States. They provided for indirect democracy, or, a republic. The Founding Fathers were classical conservatives. They believed that democratic ideals would best be obtained by a governenment that was not dependent upon the daily whims of the population. The people would best be served by electing representatives who would uphold the framework of government set down in the Constitution.
Why does pure democracy have no cure for mischief of faction?
Pure Democracy cannot cure the mischief of faction because if the faction is a majority, than they will pursue their interests at the expense of national welfare.
Why did the new state prefer a republic rather than a democracy for their government?
because the republicanism is better than pure democracy
Is direct democracy good for state government?
Pure democracy, as our Founding Fathers knew and feared, is a very poor form of government. Democracy is 3 tigers and a goat voting on what's for dinner. Slavery was OK under a democracy, and the majority opinion has been wrong time after time. It has been said once the electorate understands they can vote to take money from those who earn it, and through legislation, give it to those who do not, that government is doomed. That is why we have a representative republic form of government. Describing ourselves as a "Democracy" didn't start until late in the 20th century.
Does Democracy exist in the US?
Pure "Democracy" does exist at the lowest and community level, after that it gets very complicated (one man, one vote, majority rules can lead to a lot of abuse, for that reason, our Founding Father's chose a Constitutional Republic.)
What did the word democracy have a different meaning in 1787?
In 1787, the term "democracy" was often associated with direct rule by the masses, which many Founding Fathers viewed with skepticism due to concerns about mob rule and instability. Instead, they favored a representative republic, where elected officials would make decisions on behalf of the people, thereby tempering the potential excesses of pure democracy. This distinction reflected their desire to balance popular sovereignty with safeguards against tyranny and factionalism. Thus, while rooted in the concept of popular governance, "democracy" in 1787 emphasized a more structured and controlled political framework.
Does the US have a pure democracy?
No, the United States does not have a pure democracy. It is a democratic republic where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. This system allows for a balance between direct democracy and representative democracy.
How is representative democracy different from a pure democracy?
In a representative democracy, people vote for representatives to vote on specific issues on their behalf.
How did the founding fathers protect against unlimited democracy?
The American Founders established protective measures against the 'paradox of democracy' in this general way: they founded the United States of America as a republic rather than a full-fledged democracy. By doing so, they prevented any 'tyranny of the majority' from directly using governmental power to oppress the nation as a whole while also ensuring slow, orderly change (if change should be desired) in American government, among other protective measures.
What is spirits fathers name?
His name is Strider. He is pure black.
Why are pure democracies prone to the problem of faction?
Pure Democracy cannot cure the mischief of faction because if the faction is a majority, than they will pursue their interests at the expense of national welfare. [majority rules does not necessarily guarantee an appropriate outcome]
Is democracy practical?
In its pure form, in modern nations, no.
