0
What else can I help you with?
Does the US have a pure democracy?
No, the United States does not have a pure democracy. It is a democratic republic where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. This system allows for a balance between direct democracy and representative democracy.
Why does Madison reject pure democracy in favor of representative democracy?
Many people had argued against the new Constitution claiming that the US would be too large to govern as a democracy (republic) and had too many groups, or “factions,” as political parties were then called. While Madison acknowledged that there were many differing factions, he also indicated that a democratic form of government, using the ideal of majority rule, would tame the factions and cause them to work together as much as possible. He claimed that the republican form of government created by the new Constitution would allow all the factions the room and venues to express themselves and to influence the workings of government by getting their members elected and/or appointed to offices. Minority groups would be protected because the factions would have to negotiate their differences. In this way, the republic would create a system of government in which the majority would rule but the ideas of the minority would have to be taken into consideration. Numerous factions would also mean that no one group would be able to take complete control of the government and this would give rise to what Madison called “politics,” namely, the art of governing.
What is excessive democracy?
It can be argued that pure democracy, the vote of each citizen on every issue affecting everyone, is excessive. Except for in small groups, there has never been a pure democracy governing a state. Ancient Athens was not a pure democracy as non-land holders and women could not vote, yet it was the closest any nation had ever come to it. The problems of a pure democracy become evident as a majority can vote to restrict or eliminate rights of a minority, evident with passage of "Jim Crow" laws following the US Civil War restricting rights of freed men, not all former slaves. Another problem would be the ability to consult each and every citizen in the passage of laws for each and every law, slowing the process greatly. A representative democracy, or republic, speeds this ability, and with checks and balances built in, protects the rights of individuals and minorities.
Words that describe democracy?
There is none because we dont realy know how to define the meaning of democracy.
Is pure or direct democracy more effective to govern a country like the united state?
Pure democracy involves direct participation of all citizens in decision-making, which can be slow and inefficient in a large country like the United States. Representative democracy, where citizens elect officials to make decisions on their behalf, is more practical due to the country's size and complexity. This system allows for expertise, efficiency, and greater representation of diverse viewpoints.
How does James Madison define pure democacy and what are the problems associated with this form of government?
James Madison defined pure democracy as a system of involvement of the populace in every national decision. The problems associated with this form of government is that it is very difficult to get the consensus to get anything done.
Does Madison say its possible to have tyranny in a democracy?
Yes. Madison warned against the "tyranny of the majority" in a democracy.
Does Madison say it is possible to have tyranny in democracy?
Yes. Madison warned against the "tyranny of the majority" in a democracy.
Does Madison say it is possible to have a tyranny in a democracy?
Yes. Madison warned against the "tyranny of the majority" in a democracy.
Does James Madison advocate for a republic or a democracy?
James Madison advocates for a republic rather than a pure democracy. In Federalist No. 10, he argues that a republic, with its system of elected representatives and checks and balances, is better suited to control factions and protect the rights of individuals. Madison believed that a direct democracy could lead to the tyranny of the majority, whereas a republic would help ensure a more stable and just government.
Why did Madison believe that a pure democracy was not suitable as a model for a government of the US?
James Madison believed that a pure democracy was unsuitable for the United States because it could lead to the tyranny of the majority, where the rights of minority groups could be easily overlooked or violated. He argued that a republic, with its system of elected representatives and a framework of checks and balances, would better protect individual liberties and prevent the potential chaos and instability that could arise in a direct democracy. Madison emphasized the need for a government that could manage the diverse interests of a large nation and ensure a stable and just society.
Which animal has pure blood?
You need to define pure blood.
Why did Madison believe that a pure democracy was not suitable as a model for a government of US?
James Madison believed that a pure democracy was unsuitable for the United States because it could lead to the tyranny of the majority, where the rights and interests of minority groups could be oppressed. He argued that direct democracy might result in impulsive decisions driven by passions rather than reasoned deliberation. Instead, Madison advocated for a republican form of government, where representatives would be elected to make informed decisions, thereby protecting individual rights and promoting stability. This structure would help balance the will of the majority with the need to safeguard minority rights and ensure a more deliberative governance process.
Does the US have a pure democracy?
No, the United States does not have a pure democracy. It is a democratic republic where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. This system allows for a balance between direct democracy and representative democracy.
Does Madison define a virtuous people in the federalist papers?
yes
How is representative democracy different from a pure democracy?
In a representative democracy, people vote for representatives to vote on specific issues on their behalf.
Is majority rule define a feature of democracy?
I'd think democracy. The people are the ones choosing/voting.
