To expedite his agenda , and to bypass congress .
Because these orders do not have to be passed by Congress.
For Executive Empowerment.
Because they don't require Senate consent
Presidents can offer directives about something they already have power over, but one reason that a president might issue an executive order is to get around congress, and not be subject to the normal checks and balances built into our government. Congress makes new laws... the president cannot. In the past, several presidents have been criticized for using executive orders to take more power than they should have.
What reason did the president give for justifying his claim of executive privilege
Without congressional approval
Because it was the first election of an American president.
Depends on your state but most likely yes In Australia, depending on specific court orders, yes, but usually a good reason is needed. ("not wanting to" is NOT considered a good reason!)
To be clear: I am only saying that the Affidavit likely isn't the court's reason for ordering support. The court could have another reason for ordering support, and the Affidavit would have nothing to do with it. Bottom line, if the court orders support, you are required to pay the support.
Congress wants to limit the president's influence over it. -Also Apex
. . . sign Executive Order 9981 which was an executive order issued on July 26, 1948 by President Harry S. Truman . It abolished racial discrimination in the armed forces and eventually led to the end of segregation in the services .
He helped everyone survive in the war
No. Although the incumbent president is very likely to be nominated for a second term, if there is strong reason to be believe that he will not win re-election and if another attractive candidate emerges, an incumbent president can fail to get the nomination.
A president is more likely to appoint judges who would agree with him ideologically, and therefore, would be opposed by his ideological rivals in the Senate.
Basically, the only logic reason would be because US does not have a prince. The equivalent would most likely be the President...