Ultimately, it is because time like space is relative. That is to say, how much time you experience relative to someone else depends on how fast you are moving relative to them. The closer and closer you travel at the speed of light relative to them the less and less time you experience relative to them until ultimately you experience none. For more detail go to the related question "When we travel at the speed of light why does time stop." in the Related Questions section below.
As you approach the speed of light, your personal time rate, as measured by an outside observer, will be seen to slow down, and in theory it reaches zero at the speed of light. You can't actually reach the speed of light since that requires an infinite amount of energy, but you can get arbitrarily close to that speed. The alteration in the rate at which time passes happens in accordance with the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction (which see). Given that matter, energy, space, and time all turn out to be inter-related, a sufficiently large change in speed will affect all four of these fundamental factors. That may be a somewhat vague explanation, but the precise explanation requires a lot of mathematics which would not be practical to include in my answer; you would have to go to a serious text on relativity.
I'm going to evade the question by giving you something to think about. If you
think about it long enough and in the right directions, you come to the conclusion
that when things move, they must become shorter and more massive, and their
clocks must run slow:
-- One day, your friend, who is always doing something crazy, comes flying
through your laboratory ... sailing right in the front door and out the back door
without ever slowing down. For some strange reason, he's carrying a ruler and
a clock, and as he swoops through, you decide that you really must know the
length of the ruler, and whether the clock is keeping accurate time. How could
you measure them without making him stop ? Remember that light takes time to
travel from one place to another.
That's your assignment ... to think about this weird situation.
Work on it for a while, but don't be discouraged if you don't get very far. A great many
very smart people worked on it for a very long time, and the first one who actually
worked it out correctly was Albert Einstein, not much more than 100 years ago.
When you travel the speed of light everything around you is frozen in time but the further away something is from you the less of the effect. the light travels 9million seconds per second so that is why if you were to go back living our hours you would be very confused
For example, if a star is at a distance of 5 light-years, it will take 5 years to travel there at the speed of light.
Light always travels at the speed of light. The only time that's 299,792,458 meters per second is when the light is in vacuum.
It is not possible for any object with any mass to travel at the speed of light. It is possible to travel at 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999% the speed of light, you could even travel at "99.9 followed by a trillion trillion 9s"% of the speed of light but never quite 100%.According to our current mathematical theories, for an object with any mass to travel at the speed of light it would take infinite energy to attain that speed.
This is an unanswerable question, since time is a dimension and the speed of light a measurement. The two are directly related, however, insofar as approaching the speed of light inversely affects the relative speed with which you travel through time. For instance, one year on a spaceship going 99% the speed of light (it is impossible to reach the speed of light relative to local space-time, in that paradoxical scenario time would stop completely) would cause you to return to an Earth that has aged hundreds or possibly thousands of years (I'm not sure the precise speed to time conversion formula).
When you travel the speed of light everything around you is frozen in time but the further away something is from you the less of the effect. the light travels 9million seconds per second so that is why if you were to go back living our hours you would be very confused
For example, if a star is at a distance of 5 light-years, it will take 5 years to travel there at the speed of light.
99.995 %
There hasn't been up to time of answer an aircraft fly at or higher that the speed of light
distance = speed x time. Multiply the speed of light (in miles/second in this case) by the time in seconds, to get the distance travel in miles.
Light always travels at the speed of light. The only time that's 299,792,458 meters per second is when the light is in vacuum.
900 billion years - if you travel near the speed of light. If you travel at any slower speed, it will take longer of course. But do some reading on time dilation - if the traveller travels at a speed very near the speed of light, from his point of view it will take much less time.900 billion years - if you travel near the speed of light. If you travel at any slower speed, it will take longer of course. But do some reading on time dilation - if the traveller travels at a speed very near the speed of light, from his point of view it will take much less time.900 billion years - if you travel near the speed of light. If you travel at any slower speed, it will take longer of course. But do some reading on time dilation - if the traveller travels at a speed very near the speed of light, from his point of view it will take much less time.900 billion years - if you travel near the speed of light. If you travel at any slower speed, it will take longer of course. But do some reading on time dilation - if the traveller travels at a speed very near the speed of light, from his point of view it will take much less time.
It is not possible for any object with any mass to travel at the speed of light. It is possible to travel at 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999% the speed of light, you could even travel at "99.9 followed by a trillion trillion 9s"% of the speed of light but never quite 100%.According to our current mathematical theories, for an object with any mass to travel at the speed of light it would take infinite energy to attain that speed.
yes light does take time to travel, and the time taken is at the speed of light. And so depending on the distance, we will know how much time it has taken.
They don't really travel at the same speed, but, on television, the distance they travel is so short, that the difference between the speed of sound and the speed of light is almost non-existant.
No,time travel is possible but it is somewhat difficult,as einstein said,"if an object travels with speed of light , the time near it would become slow and time travel wold be possible. All we need to is to produce such machine /spaceships that can travel up-to light's speed.
Nothing with a rest mass can travel at exactly the speed of light, it would take an infinite amount of energy. Light can travel at that speed because it has zero rest mass. Earlier Answer below So far, we don't know if a human can travel at lightspeed. However, it's easier to travel at the speed of light than to travel through time. New Answer: The problem I always had with the term light speed is that speed is relative. We may be traveling close to the speed of light right now in relation to some other object in the universe.