Because their culture was base on gratifying the image of honor. Such as the American culture is base on gratifying the image by becoming a celebrity either in the classroom or in life. A true tragic hero is to help both who fell in the illusionary images out and those who are out of the illusionary images in through compassion, making him having no life for himself that is tragic, and a teacher thus a hero. @ dan020350
The concept of a tragic hero being high and prosperous highlights the contrast between their initial status and their eventual downfall, which creates a sense of dramatic tension for the audience. Their elevated position also makes their fall from grace more impactful and emphasizes the universal theme of the unpredictability of fate. It allows the audience to reflect on themes of human ambition, pride, and the consequences of unchecked power.
Willy Loman differs from the tragic heroes of ancient Greek tragedies in that he is an ordinary, everyday man struggling with personal and societal pressures in a modern urban setting, whereas ancient Greek tragic heroes typically held high status and faced challenges related to fate and divine intervention. Additionally, Willy's tragic downfall is a result of his own flaws and illusions rather than predetermined fate or external forces.
Zeus is not typically considered a tragic hero because he does not exhibit the characteristics associated with this literary archetype. Tragic heroes typically have a fatal flaw that leads to their downfall, which is not a prominent aspect of Zeus' character in Greek mythology.
Tragic virtue is a concept in philosophy that refers to the admirable qualities displayed by tragic heroes in Greek tragedies. These qualities include courage, nobility, and a sense of duty, but ultimately lead to their downfall due to a fatal flaw or error in judgment. Tragic virtue highlights the complex and conflicted nature of human behavior and moral choices.
One key difference is that Miller's conception of tragedy often focuses on the struggles of ordinary individuals, while Aristotle's definition emphasizes tragic heroes of noble birth facing a downfall due to a fatal flaw. Miller's tragedies are often rooted in the social and moral conflicts of contemporary society, whereas Aristotle's view is more rooted in classical ideas of heroism and fate.
Willy Loman differs from a traditional tragic hero in that he is not a high-born or noble character with a fatal flaw that leads to his downfall. Instead, Willy is an ordinary, middle-class salesperson who struggles with feelings of inadequacy and delusions of grandeur. His downfall is a result of societal pressures and personal failings rather than a tragic flaw inherent to his character.
I think the tragic heroes are Rome and Juliet
Hamlet
aeschylus
They have a flaw that will ultimately lead to their undoing.
John Lewis Longley has written: 'The tragic mask' -- subject(s): Characters, Heroes, Heroes in literature, Tragic, The, in literature 'Robert Penn Warren' -- subject(s): Criticism and interpretation, In literature
Greeks are often portrayed as tragic heroes due to their strong sense of destiny and fate, as well as their internal struggle with moral dilemmas and flaws. Their enduring power as tragic heroes comes from their ability to elicit deep emotional responses from audiences while grappling with universal themes of hubris, downfall, and redemption. This complexity and depth in character make them compelling figures in storytelling and theatre.
They are both tragic heroes.
Willy Loman differs from the tragic heroes of ancient Greek tragedies in that he is an ordinary, everyday man struggling with personal and societal pressures in a modern urban setting, whereas ancient Greek tragic heroes typically held high status and faced challenges related to fate and divine intervention. Additionally, Willy's tragic downfall is a result of his own flaws and illusions rather than predetermined fate or external forces.
Shakespeare's protagonists are less rigidly defined than Greek heroes, and they combine both tragic and comic elements.
Tragic and Epic heroes have some common traits, such as their upbringing, or their actions during the story's exposition. In the start a story, both heroes are of noble stature and obtain great strength. They are usually known by their people and are faced with a dilemma. As both heroes are human beings, they are neither virtuous nor malevolent, but lay between. They are both heroes, meaning that they are idolized or looked up to by others. Tragic and Epic heroes both have an effect on the reader, either fulfilling their needs or causing catharsis. Either way, they have an emotional effect on the reader, resulting in an epiphany or sudden realization. Both heroes, at the end of the novel, poem, or story, allow the reader to perceive the strength or the capability of an ordinary human being. _____ Salma El Azhary Gr. 10 Student
Stories of tragic heroes are compelling because they explore deep human emotions such as hubris, destiny, and the struggle between fate and free will. These stories often prompt reflection on moral dilemmas, the consequences of choices, and the complexities of the human experience, resonating with audiences across different cultures and time periods. Tragic heroes' downfall reminds us of our own vulnerabilities, making their narratives timeless and universally relevant.
They are internally conflicted between doing right and wrong