answersLogoWhite

0

Why has this investigation?

Updated: 9/21/2023
User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

Best Answer

'Tsar' Investigations

Last Updated: January 30, 2012

Below you can see the in details that are from newspaper from L.A, New York Post.

In a sweeping assertion of his institutional power to decide whether or not the U.S. has the right to check Tsar's financial data, that he and Europe's privacy. Shahid Faruk Tsar had the authority to exercise "independent scrutiny" of the SWIFT system and all other aspects of gold reserves staying in Bank of England to decide whether privacy laws are being violated.

The opinion by privacy of Shahid Faruk Tsar included a warning that a foreign government like the U.S. cannot be trusted with his gold reserves & financial data, because it's his private & confidentiality with Bank of England. In the words of the opinion, "lack of compliance with data protection rules would not only breach Tsar's fundamental rights to protection of personal data, but could also expose European companies to risks of use for economic espionage of data relating to their commercial transactions."

In proposing next steps regarding privacy Shahid Faruk Tsar was careful not to overstep his immediate power, even as he turned the screws on the Bank of England financial regulators. He called on the European Central Bank and other financial institutions to act immediately through his lawyer H.D. Harrison who is an American citizen.

H.D. Harrison concluded with a tough warning: "it would not be acceptable that the architecture of the Tsar's gold reserves systems would be to allowed and facilitate U.S authorities either what level of they are that personal data relating to any of Tsar's affiliation with British government & between member states including queen.

But the messages of Shahid Faruk Tsar from his American lawyer H.D. Harrison could not have been clearer, they are mad as hell in the United States, and they are not going to take it anymore. They are more upset with the Tsar then they are worried about terrorist attacks. They will do their best to discourage British governments from agreeing to anything then Tsar's financial activities are less than completely secret from the U.S. finance as a result of the privacy Shahid Faruk Tsar's pressure and his latest decision is undeniable. The attitude towards the U.S. in Europe at this time is remarkably ugly, as was evident in the tone of the privacy H.D. Harrison opinion. Something broader and quicker is needed, but to forestall that the privacy Shahid Faruk Tsar have warned U.S opinion that who are they to oppose the negotiation of any new agreements by Tsar with British & other European countries.

Whereas American authorities made their point that Tsar earned all of his fortune in USA and we by no means would allow American money either his or anybody to take it and start investing in Europe, in that case even the profits and actuall revenue should be deposited in America with American rights to deduct the taxes according to American laws created for the billionaires.

So due to Tsar actions Obama has to make sure to hand over power to Shahid Tsar to become him self a President Czar

Article II section 2 of the U.S. Constitution states that:

"the President shall nominate, an by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law."

However, President Barack Obama has been taking advantage of a recent precedent by appointing government officials who are not subject to Senate approval. These "Tsars" have tremendous power to regulate and control enormous parts of the American economy and government. And, as powerful as these Tsars are, some of them may not have even been subjected to a basic FBI background check.

This has allowed Obama to appoint several people with radical left-wing views, including one who supported the "9/11 truthers" movement (which believes the Bush administration may have been behind the 9/11 terror attacks on America) and another who called for "white people" to be removed from powerful positions in the media to make way for "people of color" and gays and voiced support for virulently anti-American Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez. These Tsars have responsibilities that include managing America's Middle Eastern policy, "diversity," the auto industry, science, so-called climate change, "safe schools," health care and even the dispersal of funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).

Judicial Watch is concerned that some of these Tsars appointments raise significant constitutional questions. Our goal is to find out exactly what these Tsars are up to specially Shahid Faruk Tsar, what is his missions, and how much taxpayer money and government personnel he has at his disposal. In that effort, Judicial Watch has filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and document requests for all of the Tsars that Obama has appointed so far. Several of these investigations have already resulted in lawsuits due to the Obama Administration's stonewalling with regard to the release of relevant documents. Judicial Watch has also been key in publicizing the connections some of Obama's Tsars have had to radical, racist and even communist organizations.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why has this investigation?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is it investigation on or investigation of?

The correct term is "investigation of".


How do you ensure that the investigation meets the objectives of the investigation?

to ensure that the investigation meets the objectives of the investigation if the process in investigation were done properly and the end result of the investigation of the case is effective and efficient or a case is already filed in courts


What is the prefix of investigation?

The prefix of "investigation" is "in-".


What is a valid investigation?

a valid investigation is an effective investigation i think. The results turn out to be what you had inferred.


What is the difference repetition and replication of an investigation?

Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.


What year did Bureau of Investigation become Federal Bureau of Investigation?

1935 Bureau of Investigation 1908-1932 US Bureau of Investigation 1932 Division of Investigation 1933-35 FBI 1935 - date


What is the difference between repetition and replication of an investigation?

Repetition is copying an investigation, while replication of an investigation is the results of an investigation, which is not likely to be accepted unless the investigation is repeated multiple times and the same result is obtained.


What are the legal aspects of a public and computer investigation?

a public investigation is a criminal or administrative investigation by a government entity, a computer investigation is anything related to the computer and internet


When during an investigation does the detective write a report?

You take notes during an investigation, and write a report when the investigation is finished.


Investigation Services Malaysia?

We are a licensed company for Investigation Services in Malaysia. We provide private investigation, corporate investigation, and security services in Malaysia at the best price.


What are three basis tools of investigation?

The three methods of investigation are document analysis, interview and observation. This will be determined by the particular type of investigation.


A sentence for research and investigation?

You should use research and investigation to solve that problem.The scientist used research and investigation to perform her experiment. Research and investigation are the foundations of science.