0
No two individuals, other than identical twins, have the same DNA.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why was it difficult to use DNA as evidence in a crime pcr was invented?
you need many copies of DNA for DNA fingerprinting
What year was fingerprinting first used as evidence?
fingerprinting was first used in 1988 when the DNA fingerprint was first entered into court!
Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?
Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?Do you think DNA fingerprinting is good evidence for solving crimes. why or why not?
Are there any downsides to DNA evidence?
There are a few downsides to DNA evidence: It has been suggested that the prominence of DNA evidence on TV shows has caused juries to expect irrefutable DNA evidence before convicting someone. This may be a problem if other forms of evidence are ignored. DNA evidence can only be obtained in instances where biological substances are left behind or exchanged. This only occurs in a minority of cases. DNA evidence sometimes only proves that the person was present at the scene - it does not always prove guilt. However, if a person's DNA is found at the scene, this may be perceived as proof that they committed the crime.
How do they use DNA evidence today?
Police use DNA evidence to run tests and find out who committed a crime.
Why was it difficult to use DNA as evidence in a crime pcr was invented?
you need many copies of DNA for DNA fingerprinting
Why was it difficult to used DNA as evidence in a crime before PCR was invented?
you need many copies of DNA for DNA fingerprinting
Why was it difficult to use DNA as evidence in a crime before PCR was inventes?
you need many copies of DNA for DNA fingerprinting
Why was it difficult to use DNA as evidence in a crime before PCR was invented?
you need many copies of DNA for DNA fingerprinting
When did DNA evidence become admissible in court?
In general, state and federal courts have increasingly accepted DNA evidence as admissible. The first state appellate court decision to uphold the admission of DNA evidence was in 1988 (Andrews v. Florida, 533 So. 2d 841 [Fla. App.]), and the first major federal court decision to uphold its admission occurred in Jakobetz. By the mid-1990s, most states' courts admitted DNA test results into evidence.
Can my former wife take me to child support court after she stated in our divorce complain that our child is not my baby?
Yes. Your wife can say what ever she wants; her perjury is her issue. What matters is the name of record on the "father" line on the child's birth certificate, OR the DNA test that establishes the evidence you would need to legally refute it.
Why is it difficult to extract DNA from mummies?
Because the fragments that can have DNA extracted are quite small and can't even give evidence, describe or identify one single gene.
What part of the Constitution exempts Fingerprinting and DNA checking from the 5th amendment?
No constitutional amendment has yet been interpreted to exempt this evidence. It is based on court cases, court findings, and court rulings. The courts have ruled that the Fifth Amendment protects only evidence of a testimonial nature and DNA and fingerprint evidence is not of a testimonial naturetherefore the Fifth Amendment provides no protection.For interesting reading on this topic see the below link:
Can a parent remove their name from a child's birth certificate at any time while the child is a juvenile?
A parent cannot remove their name from a child's birth certificate unless they have official evidence such as a court ordered DNA test proving they are not the biological parent.A parent cannot remove their name from a child's birth certificate unless they have official evidence such as a court ordered DNA test proving they are not the biological parent.A parent cannot remove their name from a child's birth certificate unless they have official evidence such as a court ordered DNA test proving they are not the biological parent.A parent cannot remove their name from a child's birth certificate unless they have official evidence such as a court ordered DNA test proving they are not the biological parent.
What year was fingerprinting first used as evidence?
fingerprinting was first used in 1988 when the DNA fingerprint was first entered into court!
Example of sentences using the word identity?
"Her unique fashion choices reflected her personal identity and sense of style." "The thief's true identity was finally revealed after an extensive investigation by the police." "As a teenager, he struggled with his identity and figuring out who he truly was."
What are the arguments for and against DNA evidence?
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.
