Darwin's explanation for the fact of evolution was better than Lamarck's explanation and fit the fact of evolution. Natural selection solved much of the species problem, but acquired characteristics did not have the empirical support and explained nothing in the end.
because of religion
Darwin's. Duh. Lamarck believed in evolution by acquired traits; i.e., if a blacksmith hammers all day, his arm becomes strong. By Lamarck's theory, the blacksmith's strength would be transferred to his offspring, but this is never observed.
In short: Evolution. It means that a common ancestor is shared, but through small modifications over long periods of time, there is a large diversity.
Charles Darwin is the one usually associated with the theory of evolution, although that is a bit of a simplification. The basics of the idea had been tossed around by others before, and during Darwins work with it.
theory of evolution
Darwins theory of evolution :)
Darwins theory of evolution
no the theory of evolution is a species becoming more advanced not over populated
fittest
can someone help me please
Charles Darwin studied birds, medicine, and theory of evolution.
Did you mean Charles Darwin? (Darwinism, Theologists and Philosopher?)
There is no proven theory of evolution only the physical evidence of what Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
Genetic variations are produced by mutations and sexual recombination
If you're referring to the guy who formed the theory of evolution, no. He died in 1882, I believe.
Because due to Darwins theory of evolution, fossils lead to adaptations over time therefor giving us reason to find evolution within human beings and animals.
Hey your doing the same assignment as me!