All scientific explanations of anything, if they are backed by substantial evidence, are classified as theories. If they have not been backed by substantial evidence then they are classified as merely hypotheses. No matter how good a theory may be, we can never be absolutely certain that someone will not eventually come up with an even better explanation, hence, theories remain theories, they are not Absolute Truth.
It tells us exactly how much power is released in a nuclear power plant.
If you found this helpful please click trust below
relativity
He made Einsteins theory of relativity "Beautifull". He proved Einsteins original and not his revised theory of relativity was indeed correct. But most of all, he is an amaising person! He made Einsteins theory of relativity "Beautifull". He proved Einsteins original and not his revised theory of relativity was indeed correct. But most of all, he is an amaising person!
Speed of light is constant, not the other things.
Incomplete
the theory of relativity & quantum mechanics.
yes
Without Zero it would be impossible to measure anything.
it is a example of a law that can't be proven by science
I think the question must be the other way round!
The theory of relativity is actually a conglomerate of two theories which Einstein theorized at different times. Special relativity was published in 1905 and changed the scientific world until some of the ideas could not hold up to scrutiny. It was then that Einstein published the theory of general relativity in 1916.
For the Special Theory of Relativity, the basic postulates are:The relativity principle, i.e., laws of nature are the same for observers in different reference frames.The speed of light is the same for different observers.
no. it just contradicts it. they are both considered true