why? isn't it to adjust it downwards to max. shareholders wealth?
Sure, profit maximization relates to profits *only* while shareholder wealth also involves total company equity, debt ratios and any of 15 other financial performance measure ratios. Management could focus on profit maximization over a longer period of time, say, 40 years (Toyota), while the shareholder would rather see stock values and corporate total value increase immediately (get in and get out) (90% of American manufacturers). If management focused on short-term profit maximization, say at the expense of long term sales revenues, then shareholder wealth (stock price) could actually decrease as a result of the loss of market share. The conflict of interests between shareholders and executives is an example of the "principle-agent problem."
Another name for stockholder wealth maximization is maximization of the value of the common stock. Stockholders have little power in corporate decision making.
Corporation offering stocks ? Who can buy it ? 1- Other Corporations - Maybe Parent company to hold control 2- Individuals - make some money 3- Non corporate ? Who else remains ? .... Non-corporate means other legal forms of entities other than "corporation", like partnerships , limited liability companies .... but not individuals.
§Good ethics should be seen as a driver of profitability rather than a burden on business. §An ethical framework is part of good corporate governance and suggests a well run business. §Investors are reassured about the company's approach to risk management. §Employees will be motivated in the knowledge that they operate in an environment of good ethical corporate behaviour
Wealth maximization: To stay invested and multiply your invested money. The term is used for long-term investors. Short-term investors work for profit maximization. They sell their shares, as and when they get profit from the market.
Is it good for the society, as a whole, for management of corporate resources to be focused on maximizing shareholder value? Or are there
Sure, profit maximization relates to profits *only* while shareholder wealth also involves total company equity, debt ratios and any of 15 other financial performance measure ratios. Management could focus on profit maximization over a longer period of time, say, 40 years (Toyota), while the shareholder would rather see stock values and corporate total value increase immediately (get in and get out) (90% of American manufacturers). If management focused on short-term profit maximization, say at the expense of long term sales revenues, then shareholder wealth (stock price) could actually decrease as a result of the loss of market share. The conflict of interests between shareholders and executives is an example of the "principle-agent problem."
Another name for stockholder wealth maximization is maximization of the value of the common stock. Stockholders have little power in corporate decision making.
differentiate between value for money and profit maximization
Wealth maximization has been accepted by the finance managers, because it overcomes the limitations of profit maximization. Wealth maximization means maximizing the net wealth of the company's share holders. Wealth maximization is possible only when the company pursues policies that would increase the market value of shares of the company.
"corporate social responsibility" is how businesses monitor themselves ethically. Businesses incorporate things such as sustainability into their CSR plan
Karl Lins has written: 'Corporate governance and the shareholder base'
to improve working conditions
to improve working conditions
to improve working conditions
Corporation offering stocks ? Who can buy it ? 1- Other Corporations - Maybe Parent company to hold control 2- Individuals - make some money 3- Non corporate ? Who else remains ? .... Non-corporate means other legal forms of entities other than "corporation", like partnerships , limited liability companies .... but not individuals.
foolish student. you want someone to do the assignment for u.