0
Creationism is considered a Pseudoscience because it is impossible to prove that a divine being created a world, because we cannot study divine beings. Science only deals with things that can be observed and reported, and is based on facts, not beliefs.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoOne reason creationism is considered a pseudo-science is that creationists use pseudo-scientific arguments in support of their beliefs. Most creationists have a limited understanding of science, yet stridently argue that research scientists are wrong in their understanding of the scientific facts. They deny the possibility of a natural origin to the universe and put forward frequently misunderstood claims about how various natural laws preclude the possibility of evolution.
For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoLike any other field, Creationism can be pursued properly or improperly. "Improperly" would include sloppy work, jumping to conclusions, or letting emotions cloud one's clarity.
The same potential problems also pertain to Evolution.
If pursued in a rigorously scientific manner (peer-review, ability to duplicate results, etc.), then the same (alleged) non-biased treatment that is given to Evolution should be accorded to results, or thoughts, or findings, that do not fit the Evolutionary paradigm. Science has advanced only because of paradigm-breakers, such as particle physics and the possibility of manned flight (once deemed absurd).
Creationism is, a priori, labeled as pseudoscience by those who are against it. It's a value-judgment, which is just an offshoot of the wider paradigm.
See also:
http://religion.answers.com/controversy/is-there-evidence-against-evolution
http://www.allaboutscience.org/intelligent-design.htm
http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/sci-ev/sci_vs_ev_26.htm
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who will give a guest lecture on Creationism?
The Institute for Creation Science and Answers in Genesis are just two organisations that have speakers available to give lectures on Creationism.
Is creationism credible?
There are at least two, quite different forms of creationism, and the question of whether creationism is credible must be applied separately to each. No doubt, both Young-Earth creationism and Old-Earth creationism are credible to their proponents, but the question must be whether they are credible to other well informed people.Young-Earth creationism holds that the Earth is only a few thousand years old, usually around six thousand. However, science has proven conclusively that the world is billions of years old, so this can not be credible. Because of the overwhelming evidence that the world is certainly more than six thousand years old, some Young-Earth creationists have adapted Young-Earth creationism by saying that each of the days stated in Genesis chapter 1 was really an almost indefinite period of time. According to this version, the world could be many thousands of years old. This not only undermines the standard Young-Earth creationism argument, but it is even less credible, given that there is no supporting evidence for this, not even biblical evidence.Old-Earth creationism accepts the scientific evidence for the great age of the Earth, so from this point of view it is more credible than Young-Earth creationism. Nevertheless, some Old-Earth creationists say that God created all living things just as they are today. Others accept that species evolved, but say that this was not the result of natural selection but Intelligent Design. Both versions of Old-Earth creationism fail in the face of scientific evidence, although Intelligent Design is more sophisticated and therefore somewhat more credible. Intelligent Design is also claimed by some Young-Earth creationists, perhaps because it has captured the imagination of a proportion of the population, but it seems inherently an Old-Earth creationism concept.Ultimately credibility comes down to whether a hypothesis is compatible with the scientific evidence. Creationists do not put forward scientific evidence to support their hypotheses, instead proposing various ways in which they believe they can undermine the evidence for evolution. Occasionally, scientists respond (eg. Dawkins, Perakh, et al)and demonstrate the failure of these arguments. So, to be credible, creationism has to adapt further, until its claims are at least somewhat consistent with the scientific evidence.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
When was creationism done?
When Charles Hodge wrote "What is Darwinism?" in 1874 and argued that evolution can not explain the complexities of the eye is when creationism was first used as a tool against evolution. Before that, Thomas Aquinas and later William Paley used the design argument to 'prove' God's existence, as a small group in the United States are doing today, and the story of Creation was believed to be literally true by all Christian sects. However, it was not called 'Creationism' as there was no opposing theory at the time.
What is atheistic creationism?
Atheistic creationism is the view held by a number of idealist and Buddhist philosophers especially in the 19th century and the early 20th century. Basically every object and thing in the universe even down to the smallest atom is a mental creation, created out of mind. Minds are indeed the creators of the universe. But unlike George Berkeleys subjective idealism which was theistic for atheistic creationism there is no divine mind, there is no God. All creations were created from human minds or other forms of life.
Why is the sun considered ''the sun'' and not a star?
Nope. The sun is considered a star.
Why is phrenology considered a pseudoscience?
Why is phrenology considered a pseudoscience
What are example of pseudoscience?
Phrenology and astrology are both considered pseudosciences.
How can you identify pseudoscience?
one can be considered a pseudoscience if it did not undergone the scientific process. For example, making a conclusion before gathering facts that would support it.
What is the definition pseudoscience?
Pseudoscience refers to beliefs or practices that claim to be scientific but lack empirical evidence, are not backed by the scientific community, and often rely on unfounded assumptions or faulty reasoning. Examples include astrology, homeopathy, and creationism.
Why is creationism not considered to be a scientific theory?
To be technical it is supported by no evidence, is internally inconsistent and is not falsifiable.
Is pseudo science not considered real science?
NO! Hence the name. Concepts are referred to as pseudo-scientific when they fail to either describe events, or fail to have the ability to predict events.. they also usually have a lack of evidence to back up their claims.Some examples of pseudoscience include: 2012 phoenomena, creationism, intelligent design, out-of-place artifacts, etc.Read more: Is_pseudo_science_real_science
What is Helen of troy's relation to the creation of the world?
Helen of Troy is not considered a figure related to creationism.
One of the basic differences between science and a pseudoscience is the lack of?
One of the basic differences between science and pseudoscience is a lack of empirical research. Empirical research must meet the rigors of validity and reliability criteria to be considered science.
Is evolution pseudoscience?
No, evolution, the change in allele frequency over time in a population of organisms, is fact, The theory of evolution by natural selection, which explains much about evolution, is well supported by myriad lines of converging evidence, is internally consistent, explains the natural phenomenon it should and makes testable predictions. All science. On the other hand, creationism and intelligent design are both pseudoscience. Go here for the truth, talkorigins.org
What is the difference in being imaginative in science and in pseudoscience?
science is real and pseudoscience is fake
Which type of science is a pseudoscience?
Science is not pseudoscience. The former is authentic, the latter is fake.
What is alchemy and why is it considered a pseudoscience?
Pseudoscience is a claim, belief, or practice which is presented as scientific, but does not adhere to a valid scientific method, lacks supporting evidence or plausibility, cannot be reliably tested, or otherwise lacks scientific status. Alchemy in ancient times became what is known as chemistry in modern times. Since most of the principles can't be proven, it became a pseudoscience.
