0
What else can I help you with?
Is narrative more important than evidence in marketing?
No. Evidence is almost always more important than narrative.
Does physical evidence have greater value than eyewitness in court?
Evidence and witnesses are only as good as the lawyers questioning them or presenting evidence. Both can be reliable or found unreliable.
What is the difference in witnesses' and witnesses?
Witnesses is plural for witness. Meaning more than 1 witness.Witnesses' is possesive. Meaning belonging toWitnesses.For example, if more than 1 person claimed to bear witness to an event, collectively you could call those people witnesses to that event.If those witnesses then collectively bought a vehicle, you could say it is the witnesses' vehicle. You would mean that the vehicle was theirs - it belongs to them.
Can two females serve as witnesses for a catholic marriage?
Yes, two witnesses are required, and both can be male or female, or one of each. Also, you can have more than two witnesses if that is your wish.
Is it possible that hearsay can be more reliable evidence than direct testimony in certain situations?
Yes, hearsay can sometimes be more reliable than direct testimony in certain situations, such as when multiple witnesses provide consistent hearsay statements that support each other, or when the original source of the hearsay has no reason to lie.
Is this the right spelling of witnesses?
Witness is the correct spelling when referring to a single person."The witness has arrived in court".Witnesses is correct when referring to more than one person."The witnesses were vital to the case".
When Evidence that is more convincing than that offered by the opposition?
In debates or discussions, evidence which is more compelling than that presented by the opposition can help strengthen your argument and sway opinions in your favor. Stronger evidence could include reputable sources, expert opinions, or concrete data that directly supports your claims, making your argument more credible and persuasive. It is important to present this evidence clearly and confidently to effectively counter any opposing viewpoints.
What does perponderence of evidence mean?
Preponderance of the evidence n. the greater weight of the evidence required in a civil (non-criminal) lawsuit for the trier of fact (jury or judge without a jury) to decide in favor of one side or the other. This preponderance is based on the more convincing evidence and its probable truth or accuracy, and not on the amount of evidence. Thus one clearly knowledgable witness may provide a preponderance of evidence over a dozen witnesses with hazy testimony. Preponderence of the evidence is required in a civil case and is contrasted with "beyond a reasonable doubt," which is legal opinions, the meaning is somewhat subjective. Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill www.legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com
Why is evidence important?
Because it is now accepted as scientific fact that virtually everyone in the world has different fingerprints. This makes it statistically unlikely that anyone but you could have been at the scene of the crime.
How many witnesses saw Jesus after the resurrection?
According to the Bible, there were multiple witnesses who saw Jesus after his resurrection, including his disciples, Mary Magdalene, and more than 500 people at once.
By how far is the definition of Evidence in the Indian Evidence Act complete?
The definition of "Evidence" in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, is in itself complete. The expression of the word in the Act is inclusive rather than conclusive. The Act in interpreting "Evidence" is relatively indicative of ascertainment of the magnitude of appreciation of the evidence. It is expressed in the Act as signification of the words uttered and things exhibited by witnesses before a Court of Justice. The definition of "Evidence" covers (a) the evidence of witnesses, and (b) documentary evidence. It does not cover everything that Court has before it. "Evidence" is adduced to prove or disprove any fact the truth of which is submitted to judicial investigation. Thus, mere inclusion of something as evidence without significance of its exhibition to establish logical inference of facts existence can be regarded as inconclusive interpretation of the expression.
Individual evidence has more probative value than class evidence?
The difference is that I only work on math
