0
What else can I help you with?
How do we know history is accurate?
Historical accuracy is established through rigorous research, cross-referencing multiple sources, evaluating the credibility of those sources, and relying on archaeological evidence. Historians strive to present a balanced perspective by considering different points of view, biases, and interpretations. While historical records may sometimes be incomplete or biased, the discipline of history aims to construct the most accurate and reliable narratives based on available evidence.
Is history fact?
History is the study of past events based on reliable evidence, so it is considered factual. However, interpretations of historical events can vary based on the perspectives and biases of those recording or analyzing them. It is important to consult multiple sources and consider different viewpoints to form a comprehensive understanding of history.
What does corroborating sources allow a political scientist to do?
determine whether an assertion made by one source is likely to be true.
What is reliabe source?
A reliable source is a credible and trustworthy outlet of information that provides accurate and well-supported content. This can include academic journals, government publications, reputable news organizations, and expert-authored books. It is important to verify the credibility of a source before using it in research or decision-making.
Why are primary sources important when studying historical events?
Primary sources provide firsthand accounts of historical events, offering valuable insight into the perspectives and experiences of people living during that time. They are considered more reliable and credible than secondary sources, such as textbooks or articles, because they are created by witnesses or participants of the events being studied. Analyzing primary sources allows historians to draw their own conclusions and interpretations based on authentic evidence.
Scientific evidence supports a belief that eyewitness identification is very credible reliable and responsible for solving many crimes.?
Actually, scientific research has shown that eyewitness identification is not always reliable and can be influenced by various factors like stress, memory decay, and suggestion. While eyewitness testimony can be useful in solving crimes, it is not always infallible and should be corroborated with other evidence when possible. Courts now recognize the limitations of eyewitness testimony and often require additional evidence to support it.
Why should evidence be material?
This question is vague. Evidence does not have to be material in all situations. In a debate, for example, you use your words and knowledge to hold your position. In court, evidence is generally material because someones future is at stake, and tangible evidence is probably more reliable and easily reevaluated after long periods of standstill in a case.
How reliable is DNA fingerprinting?
It is not infallable, but it is considered reliable enough to be use as evidence.
What type of evidence tends to make a fact in question more or less probable than it would be without the evidence?
Evidence that is relevant and reliable tends to make a fact in question more or less probable. This includes direct evidence, such as eyewitness testimony or physical evidence, which can strongly support or contradict a claim. Circumstantial evidence, while less direct, can also influence probability by suggesting connections or implications related to the fact in question. Ultimately, the strength and credibility of the evidence determine its impact on the likelihood of the fact being true.
Is it possible for an operational definition to be valid but not reliable?
Is it possible for an operational definition to be valid but not reliable
What is the best evidence rule in Virginia?
The best evidence rule in Virginia, as in many jurisdictions, requires that the original document be produced when its contents are in dispute, rather than relying on secondary evidence, such as copies or oral testimony about the document. This rule aims to ensure the reliability and accuracy of evidence presented in court. However, there are exceptions where secondary evidence may be admissible, such as when the original is lost or destroyed, or if it is not reasonably available. Ultimately, the goal is to prevent inaccuracies that could arise from relying on less reliable forms of evidence.
What is the best sleep aid with as few side effects as possible?
only able to provide anecdotal evidence but having sex is the most reliable sleep aid. little or no side effects with reliable contraception.
Based on no reliable evidence?
ill founded
What is a true statement about eyewitness accounts of a event?
Eyewitness accounts can be highly variable and are often influenced by factors such as stress, attention, and memory biases. Research has shown that people may misremember details or reconstruct events inaccurately based on their perceptions or subsequent information. As a result, while eyewitness testimony can provide valuable insights, it is not always reliable and should be corroborated with other evidence whenever possible.
How can such apparently reliable evidence lead an auditor to an improper conclusion?
The auditor apparently is misinterpreting the reliable evidence presented to them. It would be advisable to have an experienced, licensed (CPA/EA) tax representative working for you to aid in this matter. Taxpayers such as yourself often mislead auditors with how they present information to them.
Which method separates modern historians from ancient Greek historians?
Basing historical accounts on reliable evidence
Does circumstantial evidence hold up in court as a reliable form of proof?
Circumstantial evidence can be considered reliable in court, but it may not be as strong as direct evidence. It can still be used to prove a case if it is convincing and points to a logical conclusion.
