0
What else can I help you with?
Can circumstantial evidence be convincing evidence?
Actually, circumstantial evidence can be more convincing than eyewitness evidence. That is what the TV show CSI is all about. If we find the accused person's fingerprints at the murder scene, the victim's blood on the accused's clothes, the bullet in the victim matches the accused's gun, and the accused had the victim's bloodstained wallet in his pocket, that is pretty convincing evidence even if it is circumstantial. Eyewitness evidence, on the other hand, is notoriously inaccurate and is frequently falsified. If the evidence against the accused is the statement of a person known to hate him, who claims to have seen him commit the murder from 200 yards away on a stormy night while not wearing his glasses, that is not very convincing evidence even if it is direct. On the other hand, just because someone had a motive to kill someone (what ever it may be), had the ability to, and has no alibi, doesn't mean that that person killed anyone. Where the circumstantial evidence is open to other interpretations, it can easily lead to false conclusions.
What does perponderence of evidence mean?
Preponderance of the evidence n. the greater weight of the evidence required in a civil (non-criminal) lawsuit for the trier of fact (jury or judge without a jury) to decide in favor of one side or the other. This preponderance is based on the more convincing evidence and its probable truth or accuracy, and not on the amount of evidence. Thus one clearly knowledgable witness may provide a preponderance of evidence over a dozen witnesses with hazy testimony. Preponderence of the evidence is required in a civil case and is contrasted with "beyond a reasonable doubt," which is legal opinions, the meaning is somewhat subjective. Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill www.legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com
Can physical abuse proved without evidence?
Nothing can be proved without evidence. There are different kinds of evidence, some more convincing than others. Circumstantial evidence - This is when you get people to tell the court that they saw you get abused, or they can say the heard you being abused. This can be used in court, but it is not very convincing to the judge or jury. Hearsay evidence - This cannot be used in court, because it is not very reliable. An example of hearsay would be, "Paul told linda who told charlie who wrote a letter to Andrea saying that Phillip was being abused." This is not very credible. Physical evidence is the most convincing, this would be like, taking a picture of a bruise. Finally, it is very important that if you know someone who is being abused or if you are being abused yourself, you MUST contact somebody to get help. Contact a relative, contact the police, tell a teacher, call a lawyer, or call protective services. Nobody has the right to abuse anybody, and abuse must be stopped. Do not be afraid to ask for help or to help another person.
Wha is the difference between relevant and material in evidence?
Relevant evidence is evidence that has a tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. Material evidence is evidence that is related to an issue in the case and has the potential to affect the outcome of the case. Relevant evidence is broader in scope, while material evidence specifically pertains to the issues at hand in a case.
What is the differences between class and individual evidences?
Class evidence is common to a group of objects or persons, while individual evidence can be linked to a unique source. Class evidence can help narrow down a pool of suspects, while individual evidence can provide a stronger link to a specific person or object. Class evidence is less specific and can be shared among multiple sources, while individual evidence is more specific and can help to identify a singular source.
What factors contribute to making a convincing argument?
A convincing argument is supported by strong evidence, logical reasoning, and clear presentation. Additionally, considering counterarguments and addressing them effectively can also contribute to making an argument more convincing.
Why does the author claim without evidence?
Making claims without evidence undermines the credibility of the author's argument. Providing evidence supports the claim, makes the argument more convincing, and helps readers understand the basis of the statement.
How Does this list make his argument more or less convincing why?
The list can make the argument more convincing by providing specific examples and supporting evidence. It can make the argument less convincing if the examples are weak or irrelevant to the main point being argued. Ultimately, the effectiveness of the list in strengthening the argument depends on the relevance and quality of the examples provided.
How does providing evidence to support an argument strengthen that argument?
Providing evidence to support an argument strengthens it by adding credibility and persuasiveness. It shows that the argument is based on facts and research, making it more convincing to the audience.
Can circumstantial evidence be convincing evidence?
Actually, circumstantial evidence can be more convincing than eyewitness evidence. That is what the TV show CSI is all about. If we find the accused person's fingerprints at the murder scene, the victim's blood on the accused's clothes, the bullet in the victim matches the accused's gun, and the accused had the victim's bloodstained wallet in his pocket, that is pretty convincing evidence even if it is circumstantial. Eyewitness evidence, on the other hand, is notoriously inaccurate and is frequently falsified. If the evidence against the accused is the statement of a person known to hate him, who claims to have seen him commit the murder from 200 yards away on a stormy night while not wearing his glasses, that is not very convincing evidence even if it is direct. On the other hand, just because someone had a motive to kill someone (what ever it may be), had the ability to, and has no alibi, doesn't mean that that person killed anyone. Where the circumstantial evidence is open to other interpretations, it can easily lead to false conclusions.
Did Jefferson's list of grievances made his argument more or less convincing?
Does this list make his argument more or less convincing? Why?
What is convincing evidence that CO poisoning is causing illness or death?
Under these circumstances, one or more persons suffering from the symptoms listed above strongly suggests CO poisoning.
What makes persuasive writing convincing?
Persuasive writing is convincing when it presents a clear argument supported by evidence and reasoning. Strong persuasive writing also takes into account the audience's values and beliefs, using language that resonates with them. Additionally, incorporating emotional appeal and addressing counterarguments can make the writing more effective in persuading the reader.
Every argument should appeal to?
logic and reason, presenting evidence and sound reasoning to support its claims. By appealing to logic and reason, an argument can be more persuasive and effective in convincing others of its validity.
What does perponderence of evidence mean?
Preponderance of the evidence n. the greater weight of the evidence required in a civil (non-criminal) lawsuit for the trier of fact (jury or judge without a jury) to decide in favor of one side or the other. This preponderance is based on the more convincing evidence and its probable truth or accuracy, and not on the amount of evidence. Thus one clearly knowledgable witness may provide a preponderance of evidence over a dozen witnesses with hazy testimony. Preponderence of the evidence is required in a civil case and is contrasted with "beyond a reasonable doubt," which is legal opinions, the meaning is somewhat subjective. Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill www.legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com
What is the latin phrase for for similarbut more convincing reasons?
a fortiori
What backs up the thesis with evidence?
To support the thesis with evidence, one can use data, statistics, research findings, expert opinions, case studies, and examples from credible sources. Providing specific examples, quotes, and references can strengthen the argument and make the thesis more convincing and credible.
