Short answer: it isn't. In fact, it is very easy to demonstrate evolution in a laboratory, or anywhere else for that matter. All one needs is a population of organisms with a short lifecycle and a notebook. Simply count how often a number of inherited traits occur in the population, and then repeat that count a number of generations later, and you'll have demonstrated evolution.
salmonella is one.
Evolution itself is a fact, as it can be observered in both the environment and in the laboratory. A theory is a statement or series of statements which describes and explains a natural phenomenon based upon a solid foundation of evidence. The theory of evolution fits into the criteria of a theory.
Regardless of what many in some political and religious spheres of influence would like us to believe, there is a huge amount of data from which the theory of evolution is derived.There is also the observable fact that evolution happens; laboratory experiments can demonstrate evolution in action, and several various instances of evolution known to have occurred (in fact, are occurring) in the natural world today.Thus, while 'validated' and 'supported' and 'verified' are more proper terms used to describe evolution, 'true' is just as acceptable.Another AnswerThere are people who disagree with the theory of evolution for religious reasons. With any belief, we should always seek the truth down to its core. We have to be careful not to develop presuppositions, before we have adequately researched the evidence for and against something proclaiming to be truth. Another AnswerEvolution is a scientific fact. To believe otherwise for religious reasons, look under the category creationism.
Evolution is quite easy in a lab. All you need is some bacteria and something that those bacteria are killed by. Add a small amount of each to a clean slide, and you can watch as the population declines - as weaker members die - before growing again - as the stronger ones reproduce. Now add more of the toxic chemical, and repeat the experiment. Keep going, and eventually you get a population that not only survives in the toxin, but thrives in it.
Proving that evolution happens can be challenging for a few reasons. Firstly, evolution occurs over long periods of time, making direct observation difficult. Additionally, the process of evolution involves gradual changes in populations, which can be difficult to track and measure. Lastly, the evidence for evolution is primarily based on indirect observations, such as fossil records and genetic analysis, which some skeptics may question.
It was where he developed his theory. The Galapagos are considered the "Laboratory of Evolution." Evolution is easily observable here.
To demonstrate the phenomena of diffration in light,the wavelength must be smaller than wavelength of light,which is very difficult,because ligth has very short wavelength.
Harvey Elmer Stork has written: 'Evolution of plants' -- subject(s): Plants, Botany, Evolution, Laboratory manuals
No. Both are birds and their wings are a derived trait common to all birds. The wings of penguins and bats display convergent evolution.
Gause's laboratory experiment demonstrated the process of competitive exclusion because he was able to isolate the two species and their common limiting resource (food) in the laboratory.
Beause
salmonella is one.
Beause
Getting money for his laboratory and inventions.
Beause
Beause
Beause