0
So that they can be tested and either confirmed if correct or disconfirmed if incorrect. Also, whether correct or incorrect the results may inspire new directions of research.
Secrecy is the enemy of scientific progress.
What else can I help you with?
Why do scientist share information?
It is important for scientists to communicate to others not only the results of the investigation, but also the methods by which the investigation was done.
How do scientist share results?
by creating a table to show there results or they write it down scientifically what the answer is in a descriptive paragraph
What are two way scientist share results?
Journals are usually published or results are shared at meetings and workshops.
Why is it important that a scientist results are evaluated by other scientist?
The first scientist may have made a mistake, or tailored the experiment to fit either a hypothesis or favorable results. The second scientist's results help to reinforce ar refute the first scientist's results.
What do scientist use to communicate or share their results?
journals,tape recorders,and online
What are two ways that scientist can share the results of their expierments?
They can use hypothesis and varible answers
What are two ways in which scientist share results?
By telling Kobe to Publish it to the media. (KC) Emerson
What scientist attitude is especially important when a scientist results go against previous ideas?
Honesty.
Why is it important for a scientist to communicate his or her results with other scientist?
The results may influence future investigations conducted by other scientists. STUPID STUDY ISLAND....
What processes are used by scientist making field studies and those doing expiriments?
both scientist ask questions share results determine what is known and investigate
Why is it important that a scientist's result's are evaluated by other scientists?
it is important because we do not know if one scientist's results will be the same as another. I hope I've helped=]
Why is it important that scientists result are evaluated by other scinetists?
The first scientist may have made a mistake, or tailored the experiment to fit either a hypothesis or favorable results. The second scientist's results help to reinforce ar refute the first scientist's results.
