They don't. Bonobos have a higher incidence of homosexuality than fruit bats.
They don't. Bonobos have a higher incidence of homosexuality than fruit bats.
They don't. Bonobos have a higher incidence of homosexuality than fruit bats.
No, it doesn't occur in significant enough numbers in either animals or humans to effect population growth at all.
Homosexuality has been a part of humanity since the dawn of humans.
Nobody chooses homosexuality. It's something that some people are born with.
Coltsfoot is believed to increase the incidence of liver damage and cancerous liver tumors in both laboratory animals and humans.
Since before humans were on earth.
Homosexuality does occur in nature in animals other than humans. So it is entirely possible. what kind of nasty question is this? and how should i know?
Tumor
Humans are animals
Homosexuals are part of nature. Unless you can prove all homosexual animals are somehow artificial; "homosexuality is not natural" would be an incorrect statement. To say that "homosexuals are part of nature" does not prove that it is natural. I could say Pedophiles are part of nature, and that would not prove that it is natural. To compare animals to humans is also foolish because we are so set apart from them. Homosexuality is not natural because it goes against the human body anatomy. Only the mind is homosexual, the body remains heterosexual.
the most common strain that causes tuberculosis in humans is Mycobacterium tuberculosis. there are also other strains, but in terms of incidence, they do not cause much damage in humans. examples of this is Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium africanum. these strains are more common in animals.
Humans are animals.
they have animals and humans live there.