0
Why is psychology from a scientific approach more reliable than through intuition and common sense?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Psychology is not a science. The psychologist Carl Jung use to get hammered by his critics because he wrote his theories on psychology in a scientific style. But psychology cannot be tested in a scientific way.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why is radiometric dating the most reliable method of dating the geologic past?
Radiometric measurement is based on the decay of certain elements, the rate of which is a known scientific fact.
Mendel used more than 28000 pea plants in his experiment. How does this large sample size make his results more reliable?
it made his actual results approach the results predicted by probability
Why is BBC a reliable site?
It is not absolutely reliable
Scientist are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Logos refers to the process of persuading a person or group using supportive evidence. A researcher must conduct experiments using the scientific method, and generate reliable and valid results
How reliable is color when determining what a mineral is?
Color is the least reliable of a mineral's characteristics used in its identification.
Are the answers from the scientific approach more reliable than those based on intuition and common sense?
yes
Why are the answers that flow from the scientific approach more reliable than those based on intuition common sense and information from blogs and the media etc.?
Scientific approaches rely on systematic observation, experimentation, and peer review, which help to minimize bias and errors. This process allows for reproducibility and verification of results, enhancing the reliability of conclusions. In contrast, intuition, common sense, and information from blogs and media are more prone to individual bias, misinformation, and lack of rigorous testing, making them less reliable sources of information.
Why is it important to use the scientific method in studying behavior?
Using the scientific method in studying behavior allows researchers to systematically investigate and understand human behavior through empirical evidence and data. This approach helps to ensure that findings are reliable, reproducible, and free from biases or false conclusions. It also helps to establish a solid foundation for building upon existing knowledge and theories in the field of psychology.
Is the psychoanalytic theory reliable?
Psychoanalytic theory, developed by Sigmund Freud, has been criticized for its lack of empirical evidence and untestable concepts. While it has influenced the field of psychology, many aspects of the theory are considered outdated and not supported by contemporary research. Its reliability is therefore a subject of debate among psychologists.
What make scientific method reliable?
because it is so very reliable
What is John Watson's view of introspection?
John Watson, a pioneer in behaviorism, rejected introspection as a method for studying psychology. He believed that psychology should focus on observable behavior rather than subjective experiences. Watson argued that introspection was not a reliable or scientific method for understanding human behavior.
When scientific work can be duplicated it?
Is reliable
Is intuition a reliable source of moral truth?
Intuition can provide insights or prompt moral reflection, but it may not always be reliable on its own. It is prone to bias, inconsistency, and can vary between individuals. It is important to critically evaluate and consider other perspectives and sources of moral truth to make well-rounded and informed ethical decisions.
How does the scientific method help scientist?
it gets them reliable results.
Why is it important for scientific research to be testable and reliable?
no
How can you receive reliable scientific information?
Scientific information should be based on reliable published sources and, it should receive limited weight according to its acceptance.
Why are the answers that flow from a scientific approach more reliable than those based on intuition and common sense?
Many people like to believe that they have some instinctive or built-in understanding of the world which infallibly leads them to make correct conclusions based on intuition and common sense, but this is an illusion. There are many things in this world that cannot be understood merely on the basis of common sense. The results of quantum mechanics, for example, fly in the face of what we expect on the basis of common sense. The actual complexity of the universe exceeds what we are going to pick up on the basis of our normal, mundane lives. People who depend upon common sense are often wrong, sometimes catastrophically wrong.
