i dont know. nobody cares. get a life
Balanced forces applied on both sides of an object cause it to be still. Unbalanced forces will cause the object to move away from the strongest force.
Both balanced and unbalanced forces can cause an object to move, accelerate, or change its direction. Additionally, in both cases, the force applied depends on the mass of the object being acted upon.
Yes, a story review can include your opinion as long as it is supported by specific details and examples from the story to explain your viewpoint. It's important to provide a balanced review that considers both strengths and weaknesses of the story.
A: They are applied both and combination of both
The other force being applied, opposing to the object's static friction would both be equal therefore the forces are balancing.
Balanced forces applied on both sides of an object cause it to be still. Unbalanced forces will cause the object to move away from the strongest force.
When something is balanced on both sides, it is called being in equilibrium or being symmetric.
The other force being applied, opposing to the object's static friction would both be equal therefore the forces are balancing.
Non-intervention
When a lever is balanced, the clockwise torque must equal the counterclockwise torque. This means that the product of the force applied and the distance from the pivot point must be the same on both sides of the lever.
Both sides utilized a variety of media channels, including newspapers, radio, and later, television, to shape and control public opinion. Propaganda techniques, such as emotional appeals, selective facts, and persuasive messaging, were employed to influence perceptions and mobilize support. Additionally, social media emerged as a powerful tool for both sides, allowing for targeted campaigns and rapid dissemination of information. These strategies aimed to create narratives that aligned with their respective agendas and rallied public sentiment in their favor.
They are held because Australia is a democracy, and public opinion should decide yes or no on a given issue. In Western Australia we have had a long and tiresome debate (and 2 referendums) about daylight saving. In both referendums the public said no, but it went ahead anyway. We are about to have a third referendum on daylight saving. I don't understand why they are holding referendums that cost the public millions, when it seems to be already decided that the public's opinion will be ignored.