Skim Milk is better because whole milk has the fat in it. Skim Milk has no fat because they took it out.
Whole milk is NOT usually cheaper than skim milk. Skim milk is usually cheaper, because the milkfat that is "skimmed" of the milk has value and can be sold on its own.
Skim is the healthiest milk. It is the lowest in calories and has a higher calcium content than whole or low-fat milks. As an extra benefit, it's also the cheapest.
False
when raw milk is separated to cream and skim most of the ash is left in the skim. To make make whole milk they add the cream back into the skim lowering the concentration of ash. Most ash test are done with a standard amount, so do to the above statement whole milk has less ash per gram than skim.
Yes
yes it spoils alot faster because it has more ingredients
Whole milk generally contains more phosphate than skim milk. This is because the fat content in whole milk can carry some of the phosphorous compounds, and the processing of skim milk can reduce these levels. However, the differences in phosphate content are not typically significant, and both types of milk provide similar nutritional benefits.
Part skim milk ricotta has some of the fats taken out so the proportion of carbs is higher.
no it causes cancer
Skim milk = nonfat milk.
According to the related links below, skim milk actually contains slightly more calcium than whole milk. The "Mail Online" link indicates that more calcium is found in the watery part of the skin milk, while the "ProCon" link gives a comparison of calcium content in whole milk and skim milk.
of course, skim milk has all the fat removed