Many countries have very strict environmental rules for strip mining, including a process to reclaim the lands after they have been mined.
False.
Subsurface mining is less disruptive to the environment that strip mining, however the danger to the miners is greater
subsurface is less harmful
Surface mining occurs close to the surface (less than a mile deep), while underground mining is underground.
In surface mining we dont make any tunnels. Surface mining is less risks as underground mining. In surface mining we follows the several conditions which are provides saftey.
yes
Surface mining is MUCH less expensive than underground mining. Usually. In some cases, underground mining is used because the substance being mined is just too deep to have a surface mine. I was just in a silver mine that is more than 5,000 feet deep. If the mine had to remove a mile of rock to get to the silver, it would not be worth mining. In THAT case, underground mining is less costly.
They mine above ground
Mining on land is less costly than mining in the deep ocean because it takes more equipment to go down to the bottom of the ocean, and all of that equipment costs more money than what they use on land.
Crime is more of a problem today because in roman times it was punishable by death so less people commited any crimes,where as today people dont realy care if they commit a crime because they know they will get away with it.
Today the main source of income for Chile is the mining of copper in the Atacama Desert. Up until the 1940s the chief mineral mined in the Atacama were nitrates. The mines closed when a process was developed to produce nitrates by a chemical process that was less costly than mining.
Today the main source of income for Chile is the mining of copper in the Atacama Desert. Up until the 1940s the chief mineral mined in the Atacama were nitrates. The mines closed when a process was developed to produce nitrates by a chemical process that was less costly than mining.