Want this question answered?
in a nuclear reaction, matter (atoms) will be converted to energy. Other than that, no. That is called the conservation of mass.
The law of conservation of energy was never found to be violated. The relevance for a machine is that a machine can not produce more energy than is put into the machine.
Conservation of energy is not violated because some of the energy is always lost as heat (due to friction).
Work output is less than or equal to the work input. This is the law of conservation of energy.
Efficiency can never be greater than one because it is the ratio between work you got out of the system and the total energy. Because of conservation of energy, the equation ΔE = Q + W reduces to Q + W = 0.
Additional DetailsIn physics, a conservation law states that a particular measurable property of an isolated physical system does not change as the system evolves. Any particular conservation law is a mathematical identity to certain symmetry of a physical system. A partial listing of conservation laws that are said to be exact laws, or more precisely have never been shown to be violated: The law of conservation of energy states that the total amount of energy in an isolated system remains constant. A consequence of this law is that energy cannot be created or destroyed. The only thing that can happen with energy in an isolated system is that it can change form, for instance kinetic energy can become thermal energy. Because energy is associated with mass in the Einstein's theory of relativity, the conservation of energy also implies the conservation of mass in isolated systems (that is, the mass of a system cannot change, so long as energy is not permitted to enter or leave the system).5 months agoAnother consequence of this law is that perpetual motion machines can only work perpetually if they deliver no energy to their surroundings. If such machines produce more energy than is put into them, they must lose mass and thus eventually disappear over perpetual time, and are therefore impossible.The law of conservation of mass/matter, also known as law of mass/matter conservation says that the mass of a closed system will remain constant, regardless of the processes acting inside the system. A similar statement is that mass cannot be created/destroyed, although it may be rearranged in space, and changed into different types of particles. This implies that for any chemical process in a closed system, the mass of the reactants must equal the mass of the products. This is also the central idea behind the first law of thermodynamics.5 months agoThe law of "matter" conservation (in the sense of conservation of particles) may be considered as an approximate physical law that holds only in the classical sense, before the advent of special relativity and quantum mechanics. Another difficulty with conservation of "matter" is that "matter" is not a well-defined word in science, and when particles which all consider to be "matter" (such as electrons and positrons) are annihilated to make photons (which are often not considered matter) then conservation of matter does not hold, even in closed systems.Mass is also not generally conserved in open systems, when various forms of energy are allowed into, or out of, the system (see for example, binding energy). However, the law of mass conservation for closed systems, as viewed over time from any single inertial frame, continues to hold in modern physics.The reason for this is that relativistic equations show that even massless particles such as photons still add mass to closed system.5 months agoTherefore, it allows mass (though not matter) to be conserved in all processes where energy does not escape the system.The historical concept of both matter and mass conservation is widely used in many fields such as chemistry, mechanics, and fluid dynamics. In modern physics, only mass conservation for closed systems continues to hold exactly.The conservation of relativistic mass implies the viewpoint of a single observer (or the view from a single inertial frame) since changing inertial frames may result in a change of the total energy (relativistic energy) for systems, and this quantity determines the relativistic mass.The principle that the mass of a system of particles must be equal to the sum of their rest masses, even though true in classical physics, may be false in special relativity. The reason that rest masses cannot be simply added is that this does not take into account other forms of energy, such as kinetic and potential energy.
Matter is everything that isn't energy. There is nothing other than matter and energy. You can't compare the two. It's like asking, "What's bigger than the universe?"
It uses less energy, to produce the same light, than the traditional light-bulbs.
of course it is
if it is an object, than it is composed of matter. if it is a form of energy, then it is not concidered matter
It's part of the process. An engine converts energy from one form to another. The power is a measure of how quickly this happens. The efficiency of the engine is defined as the output power divided by the input power (usually as a percentage). Although less power is output than was input, conservation of energy says that the power left over appears in a different, unwanted, form, usually as heat.
That is not possible. According to the law of conservation, energy cannot be created or destroyed, but is able to be transformed into another form of energy.