.
from
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, second edition, English translation 1994
121 The Old Testament is an indispensable part of Sacred Scripture. Its books are divinely inspired and retain a permanent value, (Cf. Dei Verbum 14) for the Old Covenant has never been revoked.
.
128 The Church, as early as apostolic times, (Cf. 1 Cor 10:6, 11; Heb 10:1; 1 Pet 3:21.) And then constantly in her Tradition, has illuminated the unity of the divine plan in the two Testaments through typology, which discerns in God's works of the Old Covenant prefigurations of what he accomplished in the fullness of time in the person of his incarnate Son.
.
129 Christians therefore read the Old Testament in the light of Christ crucified and risen. Such typological reading discloses the inexhaustible content of the Old Testament; but it must not make us forget that the Old Testament retains its own intrinsic value as Revelation reaffirmed by our Lord Himself. (Cf. Mk 12:29-31) Besides, the New Testament has to be read in the light of the Old. Early Christian catechesis made constant use of the Old Testament. (Cf. 1 Cor 5:6-8; 10:1-11) As an old saying put it, the New Testament lies hidden in the old and the Old Testament is unveiled in the New. (Cf. St. Augustine, Quaest. In Hept. 2, 73: J.P. Migne, ed., Patrologia Latina {Paris: 1841-1855} 34, 623; Cf. Dei Verbum 16.)
Well, all of the four versions of the Gospel are important to Roman Catholics, but I would say that it is important because it really bridges the Old Testament to the New Testament.
The same as Catholics, except without the Old Testament Apocrypha books.
The old testament is important to the Jews, but also to all christians.
The Nile River is an important river mentioned in the Old Testament.
Lutheran Bible has 66 books and Catholic Bible has 73 books. There is no difference in the New Testament of Catholics and Lutheran. However, Catholics consider 7 more books as divine in the Old Testament of the Bible.
no. they are both important to christian life.
The Old Testament.
== ==
This question can be understood in terms of reading only the Old Testament but not the New Testament, or in terms of reading only the Old Testament but nothing else that could contradict or challenge the stories and traditions portrayed in the Old Testament. For a Jew, there is no particular disadvantage in reading the Old Testament but not the New Testament, as the New Testament is not relevant to his religion. For a Christian, the disadvantage is that the books most important to his faith are in the New Testament. Anyone reading only the Old Testament and not what is now known about the history of the times and biblical scholarship on the Old Testament, the disadvantage is that the reader must take everything literally and can not have an informed view as to how literally the Old Testament should be read.
Catholicism is the fulfillment of the old testament story and is the new and everlasting covenant with God
The Old Testament is sacred to Judiasm, Christianity, some Muslims, Mormans, Catholics and many other believers. It's not like they pick and choose parts of the Old Testament. New Agers pull whatever they want from the Bible but they really don't believe the entire Bible. Some cults do that too.
The Torah is the basis of the Christian's Old Testament.