First, the amendment must go to Congress and it must have a 2/3 pass.
Second, the state legislatures must have a 3/4 pass.
The Framers wanted the people to be absolutely sure before they changed the Constitution.
the main problem would have being the the fight that the framers had, had till today and every so after. by victory
constitution can do for people because people wrote constitution with government so it can help and changes for people future
Our founding fathers knew that our country would change in time, and we needed a governing document that could change along with the needs of it's citizens. So we have the formal amendment process in order to adapt to the changes and needs of our citizens.
The US Constitution has had 27 Amendments so far.
So that random and potentially faulty amendments could not be just stuck there..
They wanted amendments to be made thoughtfully and with consensus.
They wanted amendments to be made thoughtfully and with consensus. (APEX)
The process of amending the Constitution in the future.
Do you mean "What is a change to the U.S Constitution?" if so the answer is an amendment if not ask somebody else sorry!
eats cheese so it can relax then it is really horney so it finds a female to play with
They knew that people were going to change, and that the Constitution had to change with them. In order to be a working document, it had to be changed to reflect what was going on -- they knew, for instance, that slavery was someday going to be abolished, but they knew it was going to be for several generations. However, they wanted the amendment process to be difficult, so that the Constitution wasn't changed by people's fleeting whims. In other words, they made the process difficult so that 'popular passions' wouldn't alter the Constitution.
Apparently, the process for amending the Constitution is deliberately tedious so that only the most important national issues will make it through, and the government will not be weakened by abrupt change and too much rule of the people. As a result, there have been few amendments in US history, and only one of them was repealed.
The farmers of the Constitution did not want it to be amended without careful thought
The only way to change it is by Constitutional Amendment, because it is set up in Article 2 of the Constitution as amended by the 12th Amendment. The sole leeway Congress has in the process is determining the time of choosing Electors and the date they cast their votes. There is another method. The Constitution specifies that States choose how their electors should be determined, and most states (apart from Maine and Nebraska) use the "Winner Takes All System". So a new proposal is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. Basically, if enough states agree to allow their electors to vote for candidate with the most votes in the country, the most popular candidate would always win. The electoral college would still exist, but it would be a mere formality.
The convention made it so that each state would hold a convention to ratify the Constitution. This meant a series of compromises and ratifications which were heavily influenced by Benjamin Franklin.
This question is oddly phrased so cannot properly be answered. You talk to people by going up to them and introducing yourself. You change the 'limits' -- I assume you mean term limits -- for senators by amending the Constitution. Lots of luck with that.