I like to think of it as a pie chart. The only way the smaller percentages can increase is to either nibble away at the other small areas....or the biggest one. Since the other small areas are also, effectively, minorities, it is far easier to take it from the bigger piece. As such, anything that is capable of doing that is deemed ok but whenever the bigger piece does the same things back, it's considered bad form or greedy.
Possibly a silly notion but I just thought it was an easy way to visualise it *shrugs*
its not
Traditional sexism is the belief that women's roles should be confined to the family and that women are not as fit as men for certain tasks or for leadership positions. Ex. Men work, and women stay home to cook and clean.Modern sexism has replaced traditional sexism. It takes the form of agreement with statements like "discrimination in the labor force is no longer a problem", and "in order not to appear sexist, many men are inclined to overcompensate women".
sexism
Institutional sexism is the discrimination against one gender (usually women) by means of actual rules, such as a rule stating that a particular job can only be filled by a man. This is distinct from individual sexism, in which people discriminate against women even though there is no actual rule that requires them to do so.
The simple answer is sexism. The term 'sl*t' is like the term 'wh*re', like telling women they'll get a bad reputation for wearing certain clothing, blaming rape victims for acting sexual, or telling women that their vagina will become 'loose' from having sex. It's all about controlling women's behavior to keep women subservient to men. Another possibility besides sexism against women, when explaining the above reactions, could be sexism against men. Some may think that men are naturally wired this way and are perhaps inferior to women, while women have to stoop to get to that level. So that isn't so much a matter of oppressing women as it is condemning women who they see as degrading themselves to the level of men.
Yes. They are more aggressively sexist than men, despite denial of it.
Yes, sexism against men does exist. It's called misandry, which is the male counterpart of misogyny.
Nathalie Beaulieu has written: 'For a new social contract of equality between women and men' -- subject(s): Equality, Government policy, Prevention, Sex discrimination against women, Sexism
No. Men and women's bodies are different. It's more to do with preference than it is sexism or discrimination. They may not like the woman's choice in physique, but they still might like the woman for who she is.
Around the world and throughout history men have had most of the power in societies. Because of that men were able to keep women out of voting for a while when voting became a part of governments. The reason men didn't want women to vote was sexism (Discrimination against a person because of their gender).
Sexism corse men were to busy going and fighting Hitler hailers and smelly Jews.
Marilyn Frye defined sexism as a system of beliefs and practices that systematically privilege men and disadvantage women. She emphasized that sexism encompasses both individual attitudes and societal structures that perpetuate gender inequality.