In a totalitarian society one person is in charge. This person is called a dictator and there is no freedom of voting, expression, art, press, or personal decisions. Every thing in the society is controlled. In a democracy it is the opposite. People are allowed to vote, protest, create, and make decisions that are best for them.
If interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. The advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). As the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. In the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "Master-Slave". Generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary. If one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. The extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.
Members are elected for a fixed period so that people can use their preferences again after 5 years to elect their member. This is required for efficient working in a democratic system. Moreover, in democracy people have right to express their choices and elect their leaders which will not be possible unless they are elected for a fixed period.
Efficient society
Milan.
It can be better prevent political leaders from serving their own interests - Apex
Simply because there are fewer impediments to passing laws
Totalitarian states are much much quicker at making decisions, because those that do not agree have the good sense not to mention it. Hitler was renowned for ignoring his Generals and often paid the price. Just because they can make decisions quickly does not mean it is the right one.
Simply because there are fewer impediments to passing laws
Democratic administration allows for the involvement of all stakeholders in decision-making processes, ensuring transparency, accountability, and fairness. Efficient supervision helps to monitor and regulate activities to prevent misuse of power or resources, maintain compliance with regulations, and improve overall organizational performance through effective management. Both components play critical roles in fostering good governance, enhancing public trust, and achieving organizational goals.
One reason for the efficient operation of these markets has been the public availability of creditable financial statements by those using them as a basis for their investment and credit decisions.
so that the income or benefits gained than the cost are
Making decisions that help make business more efficient are part of production and operations management. Other characteristics include conscientious and tactical decisions.
In a city of 200,000 people, a representative democracy would likely be the most efficient form of governance. This system allows citizens to elect representatives who make decisions on their behalf, reducing the administrative burden and ensuring that decisions are made by individuals who have the time and expertise to do so. Additionally, representative democracies typically have checks and balances in place to prevent dictatorship or abuse of power.
oil
yes
Typically a "fuel-efficient" car will get at least an average of 30 MPG. Anything below that is not considered fuel-efficient. Anything under 20 MPG is labeled a "gas guzzler."
Not all cars are in need of being more efficient depending on what standpoint this is considered. Hybrids, relatively speaking are very efficient cars.