Want this question answered?
Bruce Garen Peabody has written: 'The politics of judicial independence' -- subject(s): Judicial power, Judges, Judicial independence, Judicial process
Judicial independence allows judges to give rules impartially. Things like pay, security of tenure and so on gives the judges confidence that their job is not at stake when they judge honestly and impartially though the judgment pronounced may not be to some party's liking. The judiciary cannot be under the influence of the legislature nor the executive or then their judgments will not be fair.
The judicial branch is not just the nine judges of the Supreme Court although these "Supreme Court Justices" are the most important judges in the judiciary.
The whole concept of judicial independence is that judges should feel to rule as they time and location of internet access.
The independence of the judicial branch is ensured by checks and balances. Checks and balances ensures that all three branches of government have power, but not too much. It gives all branches independence, but prevents control by a single branch. Article 3, Section 1
choose Supreme Court and Federal judges
no judges are in the judicial branch
Separation of powers has again become a current issue of some controversy concerning debates about judicial independence and Political efforts to increase the accountability of judges for the quality of their work, avoiding conflicts of interest, and charges that some judges allegedly disregard procedural rules, statues, and higher court precedents.
The methods of judicial selection for federal appellate judges state appellate and state trial judges
I Have No idea thats why im asking this question
judges
what are the most powerful judges in the judicial branch called