Want this question answered?
Any high level language may be either compiled or interpreted. The difference is in the execution speed. Interpreted programs must re-learn how to do each statement in the program, whereas a compiled program is already in the machine code language of the hardware and runs much faster.
There is no real difference; a scripting language is a programming language like any other. We use the term script to infer a programming language that does not need to be compiled to a lower-level code before running. Generally speaking, a scripting language is usually a high-level, interpreted programming language.
Machine code is the native language of the machine. The machine does not "understand" any language other than its own native language. As such, all other languages, including low level assembly languages, must be compiled or interpreted in order to produce the required machine code.
Although most languages are either compiled or interpreted, there's actually nothing to prevent you interpreting a language that is normally compiled, or compiling a language that is normally interpreted. BASIC, for instance, is traditionally an interpreted language, however modern implementations use compilation. Moreover, Java is typical of many modern languages that natively use both techniques by default, compiling the high-level source code into an intermediate byte code which is than interpreted to produce the machine code. But, with a suitable compiler implementation, it is possible to produce native machine code programs from Java source code. When we speak of compiled or interpreted languages we're usually referring to the language's standard, if it has one. C and C++ are standardised and both are compiled, but there's nothing to prevent them from being interpreted. BASIC, on the other hand, is non-standard because it has such a wide-variety of variants, some of which are interpreted, some of which compile to byte code (which is then interpreted) and some of which compile to native machine code. Non-standard languages are generally non-portable therefore you have to look at the specific implementation to determine if it is compiled, interpreted, or both compiled and interpreted.
EZtrieve and EZtrieve Plus are examples of a high level language that can be either compiled or run interpretive.
Any high level language may be either compiled or interpreted. The difference is in the execution speed. Interpreted programs must re-learn how to do each statement in the program, whereas a compiled program is already in the machine code language of the hardware and runs much faster.
Some are and some are interpreted.
Nobody. Conversion from high-level encoding to low-level encoding is achieved via software, either by a compiler (compiled languages) or by an interpreter (interpreted languages). Some languages, such as Java, use both; compiling to Java byte code which is then interpreted by the Java virtual machine.
There is no real difference; a scripting language is a programming language like any other. We use the term script to infer a programming language that does not need to be compiled to a lower-level code before running. Generally speaking, a scripting language is usually a high-level, interpreted programming language.
Machine code is the native language of the machine. The machine does not "understand" any language other than its own native language. As such, all other languages, including low level assembly languages, must be compiled or interpreted in order to produce the required machine code.
Although most languages are either compiled or interpreted, there's actually nothing to prevent you interpreting a language that is normally compiled, or compiling a language that is normally interpreted. BASIC, for instance, is traditionally an interpreted language, however modern implementations use compilation. Moreover, Java is typical of many modern languages that natively use both techniques by default, compiling the high-level source code into an intermediate byte code which is than interpreted to produce the machine code. But, with a suitable compiler implementation, it is possible to produce native machine code programs from Java source code. When we speak of compiled or interpreted languages we're usually referring to the language's standard, if it has one. C and C++ are standardised and both are compiled, but there's nothing to prevent them from being interpreted. BASIC, on the other hand, is non-standard because it has such a wide-variety of variants, some of which are interpreted, some of which compile to byte code (which is then interpreted) and some of which compile to native machine code. Non-standard languages are generally non-portable therefore you have to look at the specific implementation to determine if it is compiled, interpreted, or both compiled and interpreted.
EZtrieve and EZtrieve Plus are examples of a high level language that can be either compiled or run interpretive.
Computer programming language designed to be easily written and read by humans familiar with problem subject matternot the specific architecture of any specific computer. High level languages are usually designed to be portable to many different computers. High level languages are either compiled to machine code for later running or directly interpreted and run immediately without generating machine code.
-It is a high-level and interpreted programming language. -Python is a general-purpose language. -It has a simplified syntax nature. -It is easy to understand. -It is easy to read and write. -Python is much faster than other languages.
An assembler is used to convert low-level assembly language into machine code. Assembly language is a symbolic language that maps 1:1 with the machine code produced by the assembler. A compiler is used to convert a high-level language into a low-level language such as intermediate byte code, assembly or native machine code. An interpreter is used to convert a high-level language or byte code into native machine code. Statements are typically converted to machine code instructions one statement at a time, rather than all at once. All high-level are either compiled or interpreted, however some are both compiled and interpreted. Most compiled languages compile to machine code, however some, such as Java, compile to an intermediate byte code which must then be interpreted to produce the machine code.
False. HLL-programs are compiler into low level (machine code), so they aren't slower. (Programs written in interpreted languages are indeed slower than compiled programs.)
LCD