Electricity, but there is a risk of radioactive leakage.
Because we need to. We need to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and stop producing greenhouse gases. Right now, and for the foreseeable future, say about 50 years, the only viable source of energy in the large scale is nuclear. None of the alternative sources are truly ready for large scale continuous operation. It is true that nuclear power carries risk, but so does fossil power. In fact, it can be argued that the risk of fossil power is greater, in total, than the risk of nuclear power. Unfortunately, various incidents such as Fukushima Daiichi, Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island have been highlighted way out of proportion and people are unnecessarily afraid.
it may cause diseases related to skin
The major risk is the only bi products which are capable of radiating harmful radiations such as gamma rays and emitting alpha and beta particles. Otherwise it will be a great boon for the humanity to produce electrical power in a cheaper way. In case of nuclear fusion such a problem does not exist but the pity is that for initiation we need the nuclear fission to produce the high temperature needed for fusion reaction to get started.
One main risk to nuclear power is how it is actually produced. A series of control rods must be in place before you can even start one, and a coolant system is required so the reactor doesn't melt down when it gets too hot.
The same reason as the other countries that have nuclear power plans. Firstly to show off power. The other reason : Fear. Not even for energy generation, nuclear capability is justified due to the high risk that nuclear power plants represent.
risks and benefits of nuclear power
It already is. The trouble is finding places where people don't mind having a nuclear power plant Due to the perceived risk which is misconceptionally high.
Replication
While there are many things that are not a good idea to do in an area that has a high risk of earthquakes, probably the single most dangerous thing to put in such a location would be a nuclear power plant.
Electricity, but there is a risk of radioactive leakage.
Because we need to. We need to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and stop producing greenhouse gases. Right now, and for the foreseeable future, say about 50 years, the only viable source of energy in the large scale is nuclear. None of the alternative sources are truly ready for large scale continuous operation. It is true that nuclear power carries risk, but so does fossil power. In fact, it can be argued that the risk of fossil power is greater, in total, than the risk of nuclear power. Unfortunately, various incidents such as Fukushima Daiichi, Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island have been highlighted way out of proportion and people are unnecessarily afraid.
The waste is the issue.
it may cause diseases related to skin
Hyunsuk Ahn has written: 'Investigation of reliability growth in the nuclear industry for probabilistic risk assessment' -- subject(s): Reliability (Engineering), Nuclear power plants, Risk assessment
Nuclear Risk Reduction Center was created in 1987.
Those most at risk in a nuclear energy accident are the workers at the nuclear facility itself.