No, there should not be a time limit on welfare. These people need to be able to live properly.
The welfare of the people should be an important concern for any government.
No,thats like saying since you on welfare you cant buy a nice iphone that people that arent on welfare sould be able to buy.
There are a great many people in the world who believe that welfare should be limited by time. Others do not believe this.
Welfare money should be replaced with welfare coupons for necessities. If a person is too lazy to get a job death is still not an appropriate punishment for lazyness so they should still get welfare, but they should get the bare minimum. That will motivate the vast majority of people, since most people aren't happy with the bare minimum.
The money for welfare comes from the taxes people in work are paying. If welfare funds are not limited then two things would happen. 1) The taxes working people would have to pay would have to go up allot. 2) People in work would begin to think why should I work (and pay all these taxes) when I can get as much welfare as I need for doing nothing. The purpose of welfare is to make sure that people that have fallen on hard times do not become destitute - the amount of welfare needs to be a balance between what people need and what tax payers feel is a fair tax to ask them to contribute. This means that welfare must be limited.
The welfare of the people is the supreme law.
just about over 5 million people have and get welfare checks
The health (or welfare) of the people should be the supreme law.
National Socialist People's Welfare ended in 1945.
Trusteeship is a philosophy that was created by Mahatma Gandhi. It provides that wealthy people should be in charge of trusts that were created for the welfare of people.
Agung Laksono is the Coordinating Minister for the People's Welfare for Indonesia.