The electoral college gives more clout to smaller states. If a candidate only needed a simple majority they may only campaign or try to appease larger states or regions of the country. With the Electoral College system any vote for a candidate after the majority has been won in a certain state do not help a candidate. If votes counted over a state majority vote count, larger states would be targeted and paid more attention by candidates.
Currently the large state of California has about 11% of the US population and controls about 10% of the electoral college vote. The small state of Rhode Island has about .3% of the US population but controls a little less then 1% of the electoral college vote.
You shouldn't! It's undemocratic, because it misrepresents the popular vote. Most states have a winner-take-all system, but very rarely does the winner of a state get more than 75% of the votes!
it is cool
The representatives within the electoral college are to cast a vote based on the majority vote of the area they represent.
The electoral college
The citizens are the voters for the electoral college.
We the people, not we electoral college
electoral college
Individuals who support the candidate that lost the Electoral College election generally are against the Electoral College system.
electoral college The Electoral College probabably electoral college
electoral college.
The president is chosen by an electoral college.
Look up the electoral college process and you'll understand better. Hint: we pick, they pick. This happened because in colonial times, they couldn't decide who should pick the president: the "smart" people or citizens. Hope I helped....
watch sonny with a chance it should help