Want this question answered?
That the Law of Conservation of Matter has been proven to be true once again. I could also conclude that the experiment occured within a closed sytem where no gas was lost. So many conclusions, so little time.
Aristotle's dynamic motion theory was proven wrong by a man named Galileo. He tested Aristotle's theory by dropping a heavy object and a lighter object at the same time. The experiment proved Aristotle wrong because the result was that the two objects were falling at the same rate (speed).
That is a really good science experiment! I happen to know that some liquids will boost plant growth while others will delay it. For example, it is proven that carbonated water will boost plant growth.
If a scientist isn't creative, then not only will he not come up with a valid experiment, but he may not even believe the results. Many scientists are biased... biased basically means they lean towards a certain result even if their proven wrong.
Nothing has been proven, but there are theories.
That's the first step.
A hypothesis is the idea of what the conclusion will be of your experiment.
proven wrong!!!!
A testable prediction is a statement that is either proven true or proven false in a scientific experiment. It is also known as a hypothesis.
A reliable experiment is one that can be proven or has been worked out several times giving valid or dependable results.
False.
A conclusion is what the experimenter observes from the experiment andwhether your hypothesis was proven correct or not.While the theory is the facts that is known about the experiment
The materials that are used to make baseballs are scientifically proven to work together perfectly to meet he objective of the game. Through experiment, the small rubber core works in tangent with the leather wrapping and center string to create the exact effect needed for the game of baseball.
a control group and statistical analysys of the resultsalso, to be considered valid, the results of a scientific experiment must be repeatable and still proven correct.
It is only science if it can be repeated, so yes, experiments do need to be repeatable in order for something to be proven. The results of the experiment should be comperable if something is to be learned.
All of them. Or none of them. I'm not sure because you DIDN'T GIVE ANY OPTIONS.
Not all hypotheses can be proven, no matter how well controlled.