answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why the miller-uray experiment have not proven that life could have risen from nonliving materials?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

When a hypothesis is supported by an experiment do we say that we have proven the experiment and it can become a theory?

That's the first step.


Is a hypothesis a proven fact?

A hypothesis is the idea of what the conclusion will be of your experiment.


One of the requirements of the Scientific Method is that an experiment must be?

proven wrong!!!!


What is a testible predication?

A testable prediction is a statement that is either proven true or proven false in a scientific experiment. It is also known as a hypothesis.


What does a reliable experiment mean?

A reliable experiment is one that can be proven or has been worked out several times giving valid or dependable results.


If a hypothesis is proven false something is wrong with the experiment. true false?

False.


When a scientist does an experiment and draws a conclusion how does the conclusion differ from a theory?

A conclusion is what the experimenter observes from the experiment andwhether your hypothesis was proven correct or not.While the theory is the facts that is known about the experiment


Why were the materials that make a baseball chosen to make a baseball?

The materials that are used to make baseballs are scientifically proven to work together perfectly to meet he objective of the game. Through experiment, the small rubber core works in tangent with the leather wrapping and center string to create the exact effect needed for the game of baseball.


What does a valid experiment must include?

a control group and statistical analysys of the resultsalso, to be considered valid, the results of a scientific experiment must be repeatable and still proven correct.


Does an experiment need to be repeatable?

It is only science if it can be repeated, so yes, experiments do need to be repeatable in order for something to be proven. The results of the experiment should be comperable if something is to be learned.


A finding is a proven result obtained as part of an experiment what could be considered a valid finding?

All of them. Or none of them. I'm not sure because you DIDN'T GIVE ANY OPTIONS.


Is it true that a well conducted experiment will show the hypothesis to be true?

Not all hypotheses can be proven, no matter how well controlled.