Want this question answered?
The Articles of Confederation were discarded because the state government dominated the federal government. The Articles of Confederation did not allow for the federal government to collect taxes.
2 Articles of Confederation and The Constitution. The reason for 2 was because Articles of Confederation gave the government no power.
NO. Because he felt that we needed to write a new plan of government. We had a very week government.
The Articles were a complete mess because they didn't structure the government in a way that it could be considered a government. It allowed states to have their own money, tax people coming into their state, the states were arguing over boundaries, there was no funding for the government, no military or navy, and it was a loose confederation of states.
No they are not the same. The Articles of Confederation didn't provide the power for the government to collect taxes, for example. No, they "were" not the same* *Different author from the first paragraph.
The Articles of Confederation were discarded because the state government dominated the federal government. The Articles of Confederation did not allow for the federal government to collect taxes.
2 Articles of Confederation and The Constitution. The reason for 2 was because Articles of Confederation gave the government no power.
NO. Because he felt that we needed to write a new plan of government. We had a very week government.
the articles of confederation
The Articles of Confederation created a loose confederation of 13 independent states with a weak central government instead of creating one united nation with a strong central government like the constitution.
The Articles were a complete mess because they didn't structure the government in a way that it could be considered a government. It allowed states to have their own money, tax people coming into their state, the states were arguing over boundaries, there was no funding for the government, no military or navy, and it was a loose confederation of states.
No they are not the same. The Articles of Confederation didn't provide the power for the government to collect taxes, for example. No, they "were" not the same* *Different author from the first paragraph.
The Articles of Confederation failed because it did not have the power to deal with an economic crisis. The Articles of Convention failed, because the colonistas disagreed with them.
The Articles of Confederation was a weak government. Shays Rebellion demonstrated this fact when government authorities could not decide whether the state or the national government should put down the revolt. Larger states wanted to do away with the Articles of Confederation because they thought the central government needed to be stronger while smaller states wanted to keep the Articles of Confederation because they were afraid of having a strong central government.
they were gs
The articles of confederation was an important step because it was he first constitution of the United States of America.
Articles of Confederation