There is no evidence that Julius Caesar was exceptionally fond of gladiators. However, as a politician he realized their value in crowd pleasing so sponsored spectacular shows. Of course there was a secondary, financial motive for Caesar's gladiatorial events, the fighters were all from his gladiatorial school in Campania and as owner of the school, Caesar was paid for the services of his men.
Julius Caesar was a Roman so his culture would be Roman.
Julius Caesar is a name, which means it is a noun. So you use it as a noun in a sentence. For example, "Julius Caesar was a great general" or, "The man who reformed the calender was Julius Caesar".
No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.
Metellus distracts Caesar.
Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.
Cleopatra had a son with Julius Caesar (or so she claimed) and she had two sons with Marc Antony.Cleopatra had a son with Julius Caesar (or so she claimed) and she had two sons with Marc Antony.Cleopatra had a son with Julius Caesar (or so she claimed) and she had two sons with Marc Antony.Cleopatra had a son with Julius Caesar (or so she claimed) and she had two sons with Marc Antony.Cleopatra had a son with Julius Caesar (or so she claimed) and she had two sons with Marc Antony.Cleopatra had a son with Julius Caesar (or so she claimed) and she had two sons with Marc Antony.Cleopatra had a son with Julius Caesar (or so she claimed) and she had two sons with Marc Antony.Cleopatra had a son with Julius Caesar (or so she claimed) and she had two sons with Marc Antony.Cleopatra had a son with Julius Caesar (or so she claimed) and she had two sons with Marc Antony.
Julius Caesar was a Roman so his culture would be Roman.
Julius Caesar is a name, which means it is a noun. So you use it as a noun in a sentence. For example, "Julius Caesar was a great general" or, "The man who reformed the calender was Julius Caesar".
No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.No, Julius Caesar did not figure in the Spartacus events.
Julius Caesar had a massive ego.
Lol, yes, more so actually. The story is really about Julius Caesar, more Brutus.
Metellus distracts Caesar.
Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.Nothing. Julius Caesar was never a king so he could not have lost anything by being something he never was.
Julius Caesar was stabbed. Apparently he had arranged his death so he wouldn't be humiliated by dieing slowly and painfully (he suffered chronic diarrhea ).
yes because he was
No, Rome was established 653 years before Julius Caesar was born. The mythological founder of Rome was Romulus. But in reality Rome was probably founded by a group of villages allied together for protection.
Caesar Julius is on a coin because for achievements so the people made a coin for every achievement he accomplished.