answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Firstly he wasn't a good king at all because over his ten year reign he spent six months in England - he was either fighting or living in France. Secondly he didn't care about his family, friends or people of the land he just cared about fighting.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

as a person he was acruel and predator , a real lion who kills with cold heart ,

but as a king he was adorned by his people and feared by his enemies , a true warrior king who personally defeated the greatest french knight of his age des barres in single combat , he was a genius as a military leader , so he was bad

but great king .

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Yes he was a successful king because he fought for his kingdom.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why was Richard the third so great?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp