answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The senate chose a dictator in times of emergencies only when they could not agree on a solution to the problem among themselves. With close to six hundred senators, and each having the right to express his opinion, the senate could take days to come to a consensus. A vote on a dictator was quicker, once they agreed on who was to be the dictator, that is.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why was a Roman dictator chosen to head the government in time of emergency?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

Who could have the power of a king in a emergency in roman times?

A dictator could have the sme powers of a king in Roman times.


Why did the roman government change during emergencies?

The Roman government changed during emergencies in order to get the crisis solved. Many times the consuls and the senate could not agree on a solution or a reaction to the emergency so they appointed a dictator who had full power to solve the problem.


Who took control of the roman government in 49 bc and became a dictator for life?

It was Julius Caesar.


What positions in the Roman government did Caesar Hold?

The first public office Caesar was that of quaestor (second to the governor) in the Roman province of Hispania Ulterior (Further Spain) in 69 BC at the age of 31. The first post he held the city of Rome was that of curator of the Appian way in 66 BC and hid first public office in the city was that of aedile in 65 BC.


Did the Romans revolt against dictatorship?

No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.

Related questions

Why did the roman government create a dictator?

well the roman government created a "dictator" because it was for the use of time of extreme civil unrest.


Who could have the power of a king in a emergency in roman times?

A dictator could have the sme powers of a king in Roman times.


Why did the roman government change during emergencies?

The Roman government changed during emergencies in order to get the crisis solved. Many times the consuls and the senate could not agree on a solution or a reaction to the emergency so they appointed a dictator who had full power to solve the problem.


Who was chosen as dictator to lead the roman army and quickly defeat his foes in a single day?

Cincinnatus


How did Roman government change during emergencies?

The Senate appointed a Dictator for six months, supported by a Master of Horse, with full powers to either resolve an electoral failure or defence emergency.


What kind of government did Rome have when Julius Cesar named himself a dictator?

Julius Caesar never named himself dictator. He was named dictator by the senate. At that time the Roman government was that of a republic.


They were chosen by the Senate from the patrician class to administer the laws of Rome and command the army?

The only official that could possibly be chosen by the Roman senate was a dictator.


How many people would govern the roman republic during a major emergency?

The Dictator and his Master of Horse, appointed for a six month period to resolve a political or defence emergency.


Who took control of the roman government in 49 bc and became a dictator for life?

It was Julius Caesar.


What positions in the Roman government did Caesar Hold?

The first public office Caesar was that of quaestor (second to the governor) in the Roman province of Hispania Ulterior (Further Spain) in 69 BC at the age of 31. The first post he held the city of Rome was that of curator of the Appian way in 66 BC and hid first public office in the city was that of aedile in 65 BC.


Did the Romans revolt against dictatorship?

No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.


What role did the consul senate and dictator of the early roman empire play in the government?

they ruled the government for 6 months and were soposed to handel emergencys.They wre elected by the people.(aka roman men citizens) and could be dictator for six months. They handeld emergencys . Having them went realy well until ceasure became dictator.