answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why was the Dred Scott case so questionable?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about U.S. History

Who is Dred Scott and what did he do?

dred Scott is a slave who's master died so he sued so he can be a freeman the thing is they didnt free him so he had to stay a slave. well guys i really hope this helped you thank you for looking at this


How did Dred Scott CASE affect the civil war?

The Dred Scott Decision helped lead to the Civil War because it caused fighting between the North and South. The North was angry because people in the north had decided not to allow slavery in their states, and the Dred Scott decision allowed slaves to be brought into their states. The Dred Scott decision basically said that if a slave was brought to a free state they were still a slave because they were property. so even a free state wasn't really free. Most southerners were happy with the decision because it allowed them to take slaves with them to free states and territories and reinforced the idea that slaves had no rights as U.S. citizens. Dred Scott's case caused more trouble between the North and South.


What was the decision of the supremem court case dred Scott v sanford?

The Court interpreted the Constitution, as they believed the Founding Fathers would have meant. A man's property was sacred. Slaves were property. Therefore slavery was legal in every state of the Union. It added that a black man could not be a citizen of the USA, and could not take a white man to court. So Dred Scott's owners had no case to answer.


Why is the Dred Scott case of 1857 considered to be a landmark?

It declared slavery to be legal in every state of the Union, so invalidating all the compromises, and driving the two sides further apart than ever.


How did the civil war affect the dred Scott decision?

The Civil War resulted in the passing of the 13th Amendment (December 1865), banning slavery throughout the USA, so the Dred Scott verdict of 1857, and the whole controversy over what the Founding Fathers thought about slavery, became academic.

Related questions

Why was there so much tension in the Dred Scott vs Sanford case?

did you answer it


What was the relationship between the dred scott case and The Missouri Compromise?

The Supreme Court verdict in the Dred Scott case declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union. So this invalidated both the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850.


Why did the US Supreme Court deny Dred Scott his freedom?

The Dred Scott case of 1857 maintained the southern thinking that, as a slave, Dred Scott was no more than property. He was not entitled to citizenship, nor the right to sue.


What effect did the Supreme Sourt case have on Dred Scott's freedom?

Since the court found against him, the case had no immediate effect. A few years later however he and his family were manumitted.


Did the 13th Amendment explicitly overrule Dred Scott v Sandford?

No. The 13th amendment does prohibit slavery but i was not a amendment at the time until 8 years after the case. Dred Scott did not win the case and became property of his owner again.Another Perspective:By the time the Thirteenth Amendment was ratified in 1865, Dred Scott had been dead seven years, so he didn't personally benefit from the change. The Thirteenth Amendment set aside the precedent established in Dred Scott v. Sandford, (1857), however, so yes, you could say it overturned the Dred Scott decision because the ruling could no longer be applied, enforced or cited as precedent in future cases.Case Citation:Dred Scott v. Sandford*, 60 US 393 (1857)


What is a summary of the decision in the Dred Scott case?

He decided that people ofAfrican descent imported into the u.s. and there descendants were not citizens so they did not have legal rights to sue.


Who is Dred Scott and what did he do?

dred Scott is a slave who's master died so he sued so he can be a freeman the thing is they didnt free him so he had to stay a slave. well guys i really hope this helped you thank you for looking at this


How did the Dred Scott case affect the development of the US?

The case actually made slavery legal, so that meant that within a few years that there would have to be a solution to slavery. This lead to the civil war.


How did Dred Scott CASE affect the civil war?

The Dred Scott Decision helped lead to the Civil War because it caused fighting between the North and South. The North was angry because people in the north had decided not to allow slavery in their states, and the Dred Scott decision allowed slaves to be brought into their states. The Dred Scott decision basically said that if a slave was brought to a free state they were still a slave because they were property. so even a free state wasn't really free. Most southerners were happy with the decision because it allowed them to take slaves with them to free states and territories and reinforced the idea that slaves had no rights as U.S. citizens. Dred Scott's case caused more trouble between the North and South.


What was Dred Scott 's religion?

Dred Scott was enslaved, so his personal beliefs or religion are not explicitly documented. The Scott family was likely influenced by the Christian beliefs of their owners. Some historians suggest that Dred Scott converted to Christianity later in life.


Why did it take so long to make a decision for Dred Scott's lawsuit?

*farts*


What was the implication of the supreme courts decision in Dred Scott v. sanford?

the dred scott case was a major turning point in the debate of slavery. this case made it known that slavery was protected under the constiton. slaves were considered property and in the bill of rights, property could not be taken away without a warrant. the dred scott cause let all americans know that the law staed that slaves were not humans, not citizens, did not have rights, and were property. in my opinion, this is when he debate on slavery became so serious in not be fixed with another comprimise.