Like any process of Colonialisation, annexation of Sindh was shameful because the superpower of the time, British Empire just took a non-beligerent land. Sindhi State had in fact allowed British to remain peacefully, and was interested in trade with rest of India. British however did not care for any such niceities and attacked and took over Sindh.
In his report back to home government in London of his conquest, Charles Napier wrote, "Peccavi" - latin for "I have sinned". Guilty much?
Tye annexation of sindh was a shameful british act because when they lost their pride and repect on the revolt of Afghanistan they turned over on sindh whose amirs had signed a peace treaty of friendhip with british and the british wanted to capture tye land of sindh but they had no excuse so sir charles napier provoked the amirs of sindh so much that they attacked over them . Thus, they now had an excusefor the war. The amirs were defeated and british annexed sindh. (3 marks)
It was a shameful British act because the British broke the treaty friendship with Sindh and annex it.
It was a Shameful British act because the British broke the treaty of friendship with Sindh and annex it. by M.H.KHAN.
No, scamming is a very bad thing to do. It is a shameful act.
the british started the rowlatt act in 1919
weird
The British and north American act happened in 1785
please help me find out about the British Free Ports Act!!!
Stamp Act
The British North American Act was passed in 1867. The British North American Act was passed in 1867.
ha gay
The rioting an boycotting were harming British trade.
The BNA (British North America) Act.
The Stamp Act went into effect in the British colonies in America. This act was passed by the British Parliament in 1765.