Not really, the majority of the fighting took place in France, and with this war being more of a global war, all fighting can be attributed to the First World War.
The Global War on Terrorism is considered to be WW3.
Surely all of any war is actually fighting... Yes, there were unaffcted parts of the world, indeed there were in WW2, but Global war was a part of WW1. The world had suddenly become a very modern place.....
World War I was a truly global conflict. Networks of alliances forced countries to become involved in the fighting, even if they did not directly have a stake in the conflict.
i think praticalyy none of them. politically all of them to just show the world
Because, while you're correct that the most severe fighting was in Europe, there were also battles in Africa, the Middle East and East Asia.
Today's "Global War on Terrorism" is considered by many, to be WW3.
A world war is when there are multiple countries on both sides fighting each other. Just one country against another won't cut it.
Global war against terrorism.
WW II was a multiple front war because major fighting took place in many different locations around the world.
The US is fighting the "Global War Against Terrrorists", since 11 September 2001.
WW II became a global war because it was started by nations that had global ambitions; if you try to take over the whole world, you will have a global war.