answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

There were three different sects in Judaism as a result of differing views. The Jews were united on war to upheld the religion as a hold, but some followers believed in strict discipline, some followers were interested in social liberations, and some formed followers formed a mystical group.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Because of certain historical events that split the tribes of Israel, others that divided the kingdom into two under solomons son Reheboam's reign as king, and later because of differing interpretations of torah, that lead to factions following certain rabbis, and other factions following other rabbi's. In Judaism there is no central interpretive authority(i.e. a pope or college of cardinals), much like in protestant Christianity.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Because of their differing approaches to life and to belief.

1) The Jewish group that concentrated on the study, teaching and application of the Torah in every century was and is the Torah-sages and their many disciples, from Abraham down to today.
The word "Pharisees," which is based on a Greek misspelling used by Josephus, actually refers to the Sages of the Talmud. (The Hebrew word "p'rushim," to which he referred, means people of temperance; the opposite of epicurean.)The Torah-sages such as Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai, Rabbi Yonatan ben Uziel, Chanina ben Dosa, Bava ben Buta, Shimon ben Hillel, Rabbi Eliezer, Rabbi Yehoshua, Rabbi Akiva, and hundreds of others, were active at that time and their yeshivot (Torah-academies) were flourishing. Their tens of thousands of disciples and hundreds of thousands of sympathizers were active in the Jewish world in that generation; they were the leaders and the forefront of Judaism.


Josephus talks of three groups among the Jews in late Second-Temple times: Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes. This may convey the mistaken impression that the Pharisees were just one "sect" among others, when in fact Josephus himself admits that the Pharisees (Torah-sages) with their disciples and followers constituted the large majority of the Jewish people. As he himself writes (Antiquities book 18), "the cities give great attestations to them."
Although the Christian Testament portrays them poorly, in fact the Pharisees were very egalitarian. They taught that all men were created in God's image and that all had the same rights, and the same right to an education, etc. They were devoted to the practicing of kindness, charity, the fulfillment of mitzvot, the study and teaching of Torah and the education of all people, regardless of status in society. They detested hypocrisy and actively sought it out and criticized it whenever they encountered it.


The Pharisees were the only movement to survive the destruction of the Second Temple and were the ancestors of modern Judaism.
Our traditional Jewish beliefs today, including the afterlife and the resurrection, are traditions continuing from the Prophets and the Sages of the Talmud ("Pharisees").

2) The Sadducees. These were men of politics and secular life, continuing in the ways of the HellenisingJews. They had abandoned various parts of Judaism; and they claimed no earlier source or tradition for their attitudes. They harassed the Torah-sages; and, like the tiny breakaway group called the Essenes, dwindled away after the time of the Second Destruction, like the earlier Jewish idolaters after the First Destruction.


Note that there is a common misconception that the Sadducees, like the much later (and now largely defunct) Karaites, made a deliberate decision to reject the Oral Law and reinterpret the Scriptures.
However, a careful perusal of the Talmud reveals that the Sadducees were actually opportunists who had nothing much at all to do with religion in any fashion. They were lax in Judaism and had little interest in Torah-matters.


At that time the Jewish courts still had the ability to enforce the Torah laws, and almost all Jews were Torah-observant; so, in order to avoid total rejection by the surrounding community, the Sadducees outwardly maintained a facade of keeping the major Torah precepts (such as the Sabbath), while simply ignoring the Oral Torah and customs.
They went lost not long after.
The group that did (on rare occasions) debate against the Torah-Sages concerning subjects of religious observance, were a tiny sect called the Baitusim (Boethusians), who quickly died out.

3) The Essenes were a small sect in Judea who eventually disappeared from the Jewish community. They styled themselves "observant; pious ones." The normative, majority Jewish community viewed them as breakaways from the common stream of Jewish tradition, because of their non-traditional beliefs and practices.

Their beliefs included an excessive amount of dabbling with the names of angels, messianic fervor, gnosticism and eschatological speculation; and their practices were more like Christian monasticism than the generally accepted Jewish way of living.

The practices of the Essenes included vegetarianism, dwelling in isolated groups, communal ownership, monastic asceticism and avoidance of money, commerce and private property; and (among some of them) celibacy. Also, they had some forms of non-traditional observances (such as round phylacteries [tefillin]). Some researchers identify the Essenes as a form of early Christianity, taking also into account the fact that early Christianity was far from uniform and was, for a time, thought of by some as a kind of modified Judaism.


4) The Samaritans. After the Assyrians exiled the Israelite Ten Tribes (about 2600 years ago), the Assyrian king brought non-Jews from Cutha, Babylonia and Syria (Hamat), and settled them in the depopulated area where the Ten Tribes had lived (Samaria). They were taught Judaism by one of the Jewish kohens (2 Kings 17:27), and they were taught the Torah, which they wrote in the Old Hebrew script.


While both Jews and Samaritans believed in One God, and both accepted the Torah, there were also some differences. Jerusalem was and is the holiest site for Jews, while the Samaritans took Mount Gerizim as their religious center. Later in history, the Samaritans aligned with the Greeks and accepted foreign gods (Talmud, Hullin 6a).


The Talmud relates how the Samaritans adopted some of the mitzvot (Torah-commands) but not others (Talmud, Berakhot 47b), how they denounced the Jews to Alexander in an unsuccessful bid to get him to destroy the newly-built Second Temple (Talmud, Yoma 69a), and how they interfered with the declaring of Rosh Hodesh (the New Moon) (Talmud, Rosh Hashanah 22b). Our traditions relate how the Samaritans would sometimes waylay the Jews who tried to journey to the Holy Temple.


Today the Samaritans are a small group of about 800, who practice an ancient form of Jewish worship, with animal sacrifices. They don't accept the Talmud, nor holidays such as Hanukkah.

5) The Zealots. These were a group of dangerous hotheads who acted against the advice of the Rabbis and fomented war against the Romans, leaving the Romans no choice but to crush the people anddestroy the city of Jerusalem (Talmud, Gittin 56).

See also:

Jewish history timeline

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Judaism has always had its breakaway groups, whether due to the lure of idolatry, or of power (Sadducees), or whatever other temporal desire.

1) The Jewish group that concentrated on the study, teaching and application of the Torah in every century was and is the Torah-sages and their many disciples, from Abraham down to today.
The word "Pharisees," which is based on a Greek misspelling used by Josephus, actually refers to the Sages of the Talmud. (The Hebrew word "p'rushim," to which he referred, means people of temperance; the opposite of epicurean.)The Torah-sages such as Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai, Rabbi Yonatan ben Uziel, Chanina ben Dosa, Bava ben Buta, Shimon ben Hillel, Rabbi Eliezer, Rabbi Yehoshua, Rabbi Akiva, and hundreds of others, were active at that time and their yeshivot (Torah-academies) were flourishing. Their tens of thousands of disciples and hundreds of thousands of sympathizers were active in the Jewish world in that generation; they were the leaders and the forefront of Judaism.


Josephus talks of three groups among the Jews in late Second-Temple times: Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes. This may convey the mistaken impression that the Pharisees were just one "sect" among others, when in fact Josephus himself admits that the Pharisees (Torah-sages) with their disciples and followers constituted the large majority of the Jewish people. As he himself writes (Antiquities book 18), "the cities give great attestations to them."
Although the Christian Testament portrays them poorly, in fact the Pharisees were very egalitarian. They taught that all men were created in God's image and that all had the same rights, and the same right to an education, etc. They were devoted to the practicing of kindness, charity, the fulfillment of mitzvot, the study and teaching of Torah and the education of all people, regardless of status in society. They detested hypocrisy and actively sought it out and criticized it whenever they encountered it.


The Pharisees were the only movement to survive the destruction of the Second Temple and were the ancestors of modern Judaism.
Our traditional Jewish beliefs today, including the afterlife and the resurrection, are traditions continuing from the Prophets and the Sages of the Talmud ("Pharisees").

2) The Sadducees. These were men of politics and secular life, similar to the Hellenising Jews. They had abandoned various parts of Judaism; and they claimed no earlier source or tradition for their attitudes. They harassed the Torah-sages; and, like the tiny breakaway group called the Essenes, dwindled away after the time of the Second Destruction, like the earlier Jewish idolaters after the First Destruction.


Note that there is a common misconception that the Sadducees, like the much later (and now largely defunct) Karaites, made a deliberate decision to reject the Oral Law and reinterpret the Scriptures.
However, a careful perusal of the Talmud reveals that the Sadducees were actually opportunists who had nothing much at all to do with religion in any fashion. They were lax in Judaism and had little interest in Torah-matters.


At that time the Jewish courts still had the ability to enforce the Torah laws, and almost all Jews were Torah-observant; so, in order to avoid total rejection by the surrounding community, the Sadducees outwardly maintained a facade of keeping the major Torah precepts (such as the Sabbath), while simply ignoring the Oral Torah and customs.
They went lost not long after.
The group that did (on rare occasions) debate against the Torah-Sages concerning subjects of religious observance, were a tiny sect called the Baitusim (Boethusians), who quickly died out.

3) The Essenes were a small sect in Judea who eventually disappeared from the Jewish community. They styled themselves "observant; pious ones." The normative, majority Jewish community viewed them as breakaways from the common stream of Jewish tradition, because of their non-traditional beliefs and practices.

Their beliefs included an excessive amount of dabbling with the names of angels, messianic fervor, gnosticism and eschatological speculation; and their practices were more like Christian monasticism than the generally accepted Jewish way of living.

The practices of the Essenes included vegetarianism, dwelling in isolated groups, communal ownership, monastic asceticism and avoidance of money, commerce and private property; and (among some of them) celibacy. Also, they had some forms of non-traditional observances (such as round phylacteries [tefillin]). Some researchers identify the Essenes as a form of early Christianity, taking also into account the fact that early Christianity was far from uniform and was, for a time, thought of by some as a kind of modified Judaism.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why was the religion Judaism split up into different groups?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which religion split from judaism?

Christianity.


Religious splits in judaisms?

There really was no religious split in Judaism, more so an evolution of the religion in response to the times. Judaism went into three stages, Biblical, Rabbinic, and Modern, and there never was a split in the religion itself.


When intraparty disputes split members into different groups these groups are referred to what?

When intraparty disputes split members into different groups, these groups are referred to as


Why do difference religions have difference beliefs and point of views?

because they were found be different people with different ideals, or people within a religion had different ideals so split [like between judaism and christianity].


Is judaism one of the three great religions of the world?

It depends on how you split the groups. As Christianity and Islam are both rooted in the Judaism, most people consider it one of the great religions of the world. These are the Abrahamic religions. Buddhism is more of an ethical system than a religion, but is considered one of the 3 major religions by most Sociologists. Hinduism (Centered in India) is the 3rd major religion.


Are the different group within the religious?

Yes, larger religions are split into smaller groups.


Contemporary Judaism has split into four parts The most liberal is called?

Reconstructionist Judaism


How long ago did archaea and bacteria split into two different groups?

A long time ago


What is a pi graph?

It's a graph that is a circle that is split up into percentages (%) and for different groups. ;D


Can you split 23 into equal groups?

Well, it depends on how many groups. It can't be split into whole groups because it is a prime number. But it can be split into 2 groups wit 11.5 in each Hope this helped =)


What are some reasons for differences in the same religion?

It depends on the religion, but there are several major reasons that religions form distinct sects: (1) Doctrinal Disputes: Two different individuals or groups in a religion may interpret their holy books or traditions to speak differently to the same issue. If those views are irreconcilable under the same tent, they may split. (Catholics vs. Protestants, Liberal Judaism vs. Torah Judaism) (2) Political Disputes: When a religion has political authority, differences in who has the right to power can translate into religions undergoing schisms. (Sunni Islam vs. Shiite Islam, Anglicanism vs. Episcopalianism) (3) Regional Separation: When individual groups of certain religions are separated by a large distance, changes can occur in doctrines because the leadership of the religion cannot effectively communicate with all the communities, resulting in divergences in the same religion or even schisming. (Ancient Greek Mythology vs. Ancient Roman Mythology, Ethiopian Judaism vs. Mainstream Judaism) (4) Repression Under Authoritarianism: Individual groups of certain religions can take on unique cultural or traditional aspects from being under the sovereignty of a powerful authoritarian entity that is either from a different religion or atheistic. (Albanian Islam vs. Islam in general) (5) Syncretism: Some religions form unique variants from mixing various local faiths or mixing local faiths with a new, foreign, dominant faith. (Indonesian Islam, Central African Christianity, Mexican Catholicism, Japanese Zen Buddhism, etc.)


What religion did saul of tarsus spread about the roman rmpire?

A:Mentioned only in Acts of the Apostles, Saul is the name of the apostle Paul before his conversion and his first missionary journey. Tarsus is also given in Acts as the home town of Saul. In his own epistles, Paul never mentions having been called Saul, or having come from the city of Tarsus. In spite of this, it is certainly possible that he had been called Saul and that he was from Tarsus. However, we can never be certain whether the author of Acts of the Apostles, writing several decades after the death of Paul, was mistaken in those attributions. Some of the key passages regarding Saul in Acts of the Apostles have parallels to a Saulus whom Josephus mentions in Antiquities of the Jews, with which the author of Acts is known to have been familiar. Josephus even talked of a riot in Jerusalem, led by Saulus after the stoning of James. Although this Saulus could have inspired the author of Acts, he could not really have been the same person as Paul.