Slavery was and is morally wrong.
To address the conflict over slavery
To address the conflict over slavery
North was against slavery, and south wanted more slavery. south wanted more slavery so they could work on the cotton fields. if more people work on cotton fields the south would have more money.
the compromise was not a good solution to the conflict because it was very controversial. The Fugitive Slave law required northern states, even those that had ruled slavery illegal, to abide by southern laws that declared slavery legal. it caused more conflicts in the ends and put off the civil war for about 10 years
Missouri. Before the war, the same thing happened in 'Bleeding Kansas', often seen as a curtain-raiser for main conflict.
Slavery is not a conflict of the Revolutionary war.
To address the conflict over slavery
The North South conflict in the United States of America was over slavery. The South wanted slavery and the North wanted to abolish slavery.
The North South conflict in the United States of America was over slavery. The South wanted slavery and the North wanted to abolish slavery.
Slavery was one cause of conflict between the north and the south.
"Bleeding Kansas" was the term used by newspapers to describe the conflict over slavery in Kansas, which erupted in violence between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces in the 1850s.
The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act caused an internal conflict. As a territory, Kansas was the first territory to have an armed and bloody conflict over slavery.
To address the conflict over slavery
I believe that the internal conflict with Christopher Columbus was that her was "know" for a thief and for slavery... did that help?
The main conflict between the two accounts of slavery lies in the perspectives on power dynamics and human rights. One may emphasize the economic benefits of slavery, while the other highlights the moral injustices and human suffering inflicted by the institution.
Slavery and the secession of the Southern States
To address the conflict over slavery