Because it said slavery was protected by the Constitution.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
It declared that slavery was protected by the Constitution, and asserted that a black man should not be allowed to sue his master.
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
Because the Supreme Court ruled he was still a slave even though his owner died. The North was upset by that.
Scott was a slave and could not bring suit
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
Many Southerners supported the Dred Scott decision because it reinforced the rights of slaveholders to take their slaves into free territories. They viewed the decision as a victory for states' rights and property rights over federal power.
Stonewell Jackson thought Dred Scott Decision was a supid idea
It declared that slavery was protected by the Constitution, and asserted that a black man should not be allowed to sue his master.
Many Southerners were pleased by the Dred Scott case decision because it upheld the rights of slave owners by ruling that slaves were property and not citizens, which meant they could be taken into any territory in the United States. This decision supported the expansion of slavery and protected the economic interests of slave owners in the South.
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
the dred scott decision stated that slaves are peoplealso and should'nt be property :D yurwelcomee
Southerners saw the Dred Scott decision as a victory because it upheld the rights of slaveholders to take their slaves into any state or territory, regardless of whether slavery was legal there. The decision also declared that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not American citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court, reinforcing the notion that they were property, not people.
The Dred Scott decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and ruled that slaves were property. The decision did not necessarily alarm most people in the North.
The Dred Scott decision electrified the the nation. chief justice Roger B. tanry said the Dred Scott was still a slave.