It is wrong.
Hinduism accepts anyone who believes in Hindu philosophy and religion.
In the medevial age, the conservative sentiments and casteism which affected and influenced Hinduism, denied people to adopt Hinduism but later, Reformers like Swami Dayanand Saraswati, who founded Arya Samaj and his follower Swami Shraddhanand started Shuddhi movement to convert back the Muslims and admit them to Hindu dharma.
Gandhi believed that Hindu & Muslims can never work together. Although he wanted them to work together but it was never possible.
Muslims never had conflict with the Philippino people
no, in Hinduism ahimsa was important in society. But in fields of war ahimsa was never applied.
Both claim the territory to be its own. During partition Population of majority Kashmiri were Muslims, but the ruling king was Hindu. Muslims wanted to join Pakistan, but the Hindu King wanted to stay with India. A referendum would have to take later. But never conducted by India.
No In India more than 100 million Muslims living in peace with all Indians except some individual events that never translate into a country discrimination or oppression policy.
India was under the Muslim Mughal Empire for much of the 1600s-1800s. However, southern India and Sri Lanka were never conquered by the Muslims.
Hinduism keeps unity in society. The living proof is India itself, where being 80% of the population it lets other religion to grow. where any chief office can be held by non-Hindu. Its a religion which never promoted conversions. Which acknowledges all the religions and faiths. Its the religion which never claim as the only way to eternity. being Hindu one can be atheist too. No other religion can offer that much of freedom.
Answer 1because of the British colonial policy of "divide and rule," so there would not be a mass uprising against their colonizer but instead against each other.Answer 2The hatreds between Hindus and Muslims preceded the arrival of the British and were brought about by the two communities fighting for political power and resources. Historically, Muslims were rarely under Hindu authorities, but Hindus were under Islamic authorities for numerous centuries. As a result of having more power for longer, Muslims are responsible for more of the grievances that have caused Hindu-Muslim hatreds.One of the most prevalent causes of these hatreds were forcible conversions and conversions by choice. Depending on the Muslim ruler of India, there were events of forcible conversion, but this was not consistent. King Aurangzeb is well-known in India for this act as well as destroying major Hindu Temples such as the Kashi Vishwanath temple, Kesava Deo temple and Somnath temple. His grandfather, Akbar the Great was known for permitting the free and equal practice of religion. However, the majority of Islamic converts in India came from the Untouchable and Sudra Hindu Castes who never would have had a chance to be well-treated in Hindu society. However, in Islam all men were equal before God, making conversion an escape from this social suppression. This was welcomed by the lower classes, but angered the Hindu elites.Another cause of these hatreds are the numerous wars between the Maharajas of India who would identify as representing Hindus or Muslims against other Maharajas who were of the other religion.Another cause of these hatreds was the disrespect of Muslims towards Hindu methods of worship and idolatry.
This wrong question. Never Hindu religion will destroy...
Muslims typically avoid pork is it is haraam.
No, never, no Hindu can eat cow. It is the highest sin according to Hinduism.
never mind their are lot's of Hindu got example: ganesh,ram, hanuman and so on