answersLogoWhite

0

i like turtles

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

On what issue did federalist and anti federalist disagree most strongly?

Whether a bill of rights was necessary to include in the Constitution.


Why was The Bill of Rights necessary for ratification?

to do something nasty


Why was the Bill of Rights a politically necessary addition to the Constitution?

A number of states demanded the Bill of Rights as a condition of their approval of the Constitution.


Why didn't Madison think it necessary for a bill of rights?

Madison didn't think it was necessary for a Bill of Rights because the Constitution had not granted the Federal government the powers that the Bill of Rights would guard against.


True or false Federalists were in favor of a Bill or Rights?

FALSE! They did not favor a Bill of Rights because they did not think it was necessary for a strong federal government.


Why is the Bill of Rights necessary?

Every item in the Bill of Rights describes a severe problem for the American Colonists between 1763 and 1776. It was necessary to give congress a list of restrictions. Americans believe in restricting the power of their government.


What group wanted the Bill of Rights?

the Democratic-Republicans. The federalist did not believe they were necessary


Was the bill of Right necessary for the constitution?

Bills are changeable, but constitutions are considered immutable. By writing something into a constitution, it becomes far less likely to be altered.


Did Patrick Henry believe a bill of rights was necessary?

yes but no he did at first than found out it was dangerous.


What did federalist and antifederalist disagree most strongly about?

Whether a bill of rights was necessary to include in the Constitution


Did James Wilson want a bill of rights added to the constitution?

Yes, he believed it was necessary for a successful nation


What was the federalists point of view of the bill of rights?

The Federalists thought the existing laws would be enough to protect individual rights and the B of R was not necessary.