why were the indians against the rowlatt act?
Lord Chelmsford was the Viceroy of India when the Rowlatt Act passed.
The Rowlatt Act was were laws that allowed the government to jail protestors without a trial for as long as two years.
yes people were against this act because you cool
They killed indians. Feathers, not dots.
Gandhiji converted national movement to mass movement by taking up issues that affect the masses like the salt law, Khilafat issue, Rowlatt act etc.
the british started the rowlatt act in 1919
Lord Chelmsford was the Viceroy of India when the Rowlatt Act passed.
The measures the Rowlatt Act introduced are emergency measures to deal with revolutionary activities.
The Rowlatt Act was were laws that allowed the government to jail protestors without a trial for as long as two years.
The Rowlatt Act was were laws that allowed the government to jail protestors without a trial for as long as two years.
jawaharlal nehru and gandhi
1919
1919
The Rowlatt act was passed by the British in order to suppress nationalists who refused to be satisfied by official reforms and to keep a check on revolutionary terrorism.
The Amritsar Massacre developed out of protests against the Rowlatt Act (a series of laws which allowed the British to imprison Indians without trial, and allowed the British to suppress certain news stories from being reported in newspapers.) The Amritsar Massacre lasted for about ten minutes, in which time 1650 rounds of ammunition were fired upon a gathering of unarmed men, women and children who were peacefully protesting the Rowlatt Act. Over 1000 people were killed, and 2000 wounded. Winston Churchill said of the event that "The Indians were packed together so that one bullet would drive through three or four bodies". To answer your question, such brutality and suppression turned millions of moderate Indians from supporters of the British Raj into nationalists who would never again trust the British.
lord reading
the act of rowlatt contributed to national independence for India by given the Indian people a right to have fare mitigation in the government instead of a monarchy.