New England colonies had land that was mainly filled with rocks, or sand.
The soil and climate in the southern colonies were better for growing cash crops which required a large number of slave workers.
they both had to worck and they came for a better way of life
the New England colonies were 'suposably' better due to the fact that they were very religious and they were the largest supplier of food/crops for the rest of the America's. But none of the Colonies are "better" because the southern was the 'best' farmer. Middle colonies were the 'best' at manufacturing. and the new england colonies was the better textile related colony.
The soil and climate in the southern colonies were better for growing cash crops which required a large number of slave workers.
The soil and climate in the southern colonies were better for growing cash crops which required a large number of slave workers.
The soil and climate in the southern colonies were better for growing cash crops which required a large number of slave workers.
The soil and climate in the southern colonies were better for growing cash crops which required a large number of slave workers.
The soil and climate in the southern colonies were better for growing cash crops which required a large number of slave workers.
they both had to worck and they came for a better way of life
The most simple answer is that the southern colonies had way milder weather conditions. New England is much colder and gets less sunlight on average. The South however, was a seemingly perfect environment for the foundation of plantations and other large tobacco and cotton farms. It just made sense and worked better that way.
the soil in the middle colonies was better for farming than the soil in New England. also the climate was milder,and the growing season was longer
the soil in the middle colonies was better for farming than the soil in New England. also the climate was milder,and the growing season was longer