0
Why woWhat was a common belief among historians in the early 20th century that makes their sources biaseduld a historian wish to consult multiple sources of information on a topic?
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What use is a multidisciplinary approach in the study of history?
A multi-disciplinary approach on history involves drawing of multiple disciplines to redefine the history outside of normal boundaries of traditional writings. Vedas,Puranas,writings of foreigners,travellers,old historians,modern historians,philosophers,thinkers and creative writers should be taken for preparing the history.Archives,Archeology and Geography could alos be considered while approaching the history of a country.
What were the characteristics of each Ajah in 'The Wheel of Time'?
Blues are schemers and have various agendas such as Moiraine and her quest for the dragon reborn. Greens are the Battle Ajah, considered warriors and they typically have multiple warders. Yellows specialize in Healing. Browns are Bookworms and Historians. Grays are negotiators and often advisers to Rulers. Whites follow logic and show little emotion. Reds are dedicated to hunting down men who can channel, for the purposes of 'gentling' them, and most have a dislike of men in general.
Which of the causes of the fall of the western roman empire do you think was most significant?
Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.Although there were multiple causes that contributed to the fall of the western empire, in my opinion the most significant was the deterioration of the army.
Why did Rome have multiple forums?
Emperors competed with their predecessors to build the grandest forums In addition, there was a need for multiple fora to serve the Roman population. Remember that a forum was basically a marketplace-- the ancient version of a shopping mall. With Rome's millions of people, there was a need for many fora to provide goods and service.
Amount of goods a blacksmith makes in a day?
It depends on the skill of the blacksmith. He/she can make multiple small items in a day, or they could spend days or weeks on a project.
What makes a source useful for a historian?
A source is useful for a historian if it is contemporary to the events being studied, is reliable and trustworthy, and provides valuable insights or information that can help in understanding the historical context. Additionally, sources that offer multiple perspectives or viewpoints are often considered valuable for historians.
Which best explains how a historian synthesize evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
Which best explains how a historian synthesized evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
Which best explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
Which are both techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?
Historians use corroboration, which involves cross-referencing multiple sources to confirm the accuracy of information, and contextualization, which involves placing evidence within its historical context to better understand its meaning and significance.
How do historian's synthesize evidence to draw conclusions?
They determine how multiple sources differ.
Historians cross-check their research?
Historians cross-check their research by consulting multiple sources to verify information and ensure accuracy. This process involves comparing accounts, analyzing data, and looking for corroborating evidence from different perspectives to construct a more comprehensive understanding of historical events. By verifying information in this way, historians aim to establish a more reliable and nuanced interpretation of the past.
Why is it harder for a historian to use sources than for a detectives?
Many sources that historians use are not as reliable as those used by a detective. They have to compile different sources from the same era to determine their accuracy.
How does historians think?
Historians think by analyzing and interpreting historical evidence such as documents, artifacts, and other sources to construct an understanding of the past. They often consider multiple perspectives, question established narratives, and engage in ongoing research and discussions to refine their interpretations. Historical thinking involves critical analysis, contextualization, and a commitment to representing the past accurately.
How can historians today use primary sources to determine that a date is accurate?
Historians can use primary sources such as official records, diaries, letters, and inscriptions to cross-reference multiple sources for a particular date or event. By assessing the reliability and consistency of information across different primary sources, historians can determine the accuracy of a date through triangulation and corroboration. Additionally, comparing primary sources with secondary sources can help historians validate the accuracy of a date.
How do historians make inferences?
Historians make inferences by analyzing and interpreting historical sources such as documents, artifacts, and other evidence to draw conclusions about the past. They consider the context in which the sources were created, corroborate information from multiple sources, and apply critical thinking skills to construct plausible explanations about historical events and developments.
What do historians use to check for accuracy?
Historians use a variety of primary sources such as documents, artifacts, and eyewitness accounts to check for accuracy in historical research. They also cross-reference information from multiple sources and analyze the context in which historical events took place to ensure accuracy in their interpretations. Additionally, historians may use scholarly research and peer-reviewed sources to verify the accuracy of their findings.
