answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

well first of all jesus is gods son and his only. moses went into the mountain to get the stone of the ten commandments . jesus is preaching and he says why do you follow moses but when your god is here you go with a prophet? well he says something like that. not exact words.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Dale Allison (The New Moses: A Matthean Typology) points out that many important figures of Judaism and early Christianity were portrayed as being like Moses. Allison says that Matthew makes Jesus a type of Moses in several key places: the birth and infancy narrative, the temptation, the Sermon on the Mount, the transfiguration and the appointment of a successor. Even when the Moses connection comes from Mark or Q, Allison tries to show how Matthew altered the tradition to more fully stress the connection with Moses. Matthew was simply more thorough in making the connection clear, than were other biblical biographers. Some undisputed Matthean parallels with Moses include:

  • Matthew 1:16 says the Jesus' father, Joseph, was the son of Jacob (cf Luke: Heli), just as in the Old Testament, Moses was the descendant of Jacob, who was the son of Jacob.
  • Matthew 2:14 has Joseph go with Jesus to Egypt and Jesus saved his people, just as in the Old Testament Joseph went to Egypt and Moses saved his people.
  • Matthew 2:16 has Herod slaughter the innocent infants of Bethlehem because he feared Jesus, but only Jesus survived just as the Old Testament says that the pharaoh slaughered the Israelite infants because he feared Moses, but Moses survived.
  • Matthew 4:2 has fast for forty days and forty nights in the desert, being tempted by Satan, just as Moses did not eat or drink for forty days and forty nights while on the mountain.
  • Matthew 5:1 has Jesus go up a mountain to give a new Law, including the nine Beatitudes) to the people, just as Moses went up a mountain to receive the Law, including the Ten Commandments, which he gave to the people.
This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
A:There are several passages in Matthew's Gospel, where there are subtle comparisons between Jesus and Moses, but the best known and most important is Matthew's nativity account. First of all, looking at the genealogy, we see that Joseph's father is Jacob, just as in the Old Testament, Joseph's father is Jacob. For comparison, Luke says that Joseph's father is called Heli. Matthew says that when Jesus was born, King Herod sought to slaughter all the boys under two years old, just as the pharaoh had sought to slaughter all the boys under two years old when Moses was born. The baby Jesus was saved from this slaughter, just as Moses was saved. Joseph took Jesus to Egypt to mirror the Israelite Joseph's journey to Egypt, and just as Moses travelled back to the Promised Land to save his people, Jesus travelled back from Egypt to save his people. If these narratives were historically true then Matthew's author was not comparing Jesus and Moses but reporting the facts he knew. However, the author of Luke knew nothing of these things and gives us an entirely different nativity story.

Moses is traditionally thought to have been the founder of Judaism, a role that the author of Matthew wanted to emphasise as parallelled by Jesus in founding Christianity. In the Old Testament, Moses brought the Israelites the law and fulfilled the covenant God gave to Abraham. Matthew tells us that Jesus came, not to destroy the law but to fulfil it. If Jesus could be compared to Moses, then he was indeed much more than a wandering preacher.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why would Matthew want to compare Jesus and Moses?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Where in the Old Testament is the quotation in Matthew 2 15?

A:This is a reference to Hosea 11:1. The author of Matthew was drawing a series of parallels between Moses and Jesus, and Hosea 11:1 fitted this, not only because Jesus would be called out of Egypt but also because of the gospel allusions to Moses - Hosea was referring to the Exodus when he wrote: "When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt. "


What would a Jew learn from the first verse of Matthew?

Matthew is not in the Jewish Bible.


What is the meaning of Matthew chapter 17 verse 3?

Matthew 17:3 says: "...here appeared to them Moses and E‧li′jah, conversing with him." Jesus told his apostles that he would 'die and be resurrected' (Mark 8:27-31), though he also promised that some of his disciples would "not taste death at all" until they had first seen "the Son of man coming in his kingdom" (Matthew 16:28; Mark 9:1) This promise was fulfilled a few days later when Peter, James, and John accompanied Jesus into "a lofty mountain" (Matthew 17:1; Mark 9:2; Luke 9:28) where, while praying, Jesus was transfigured into a spiritual being before them. This was a 'vision' indicating that Jesus would do a work like Moses did, but greater; and also a work like that of Elijah, but in a larger way. It was there plainly manifested that Jesus was indeed the Son of God and the 'prophet greater than Moses' ; worthy of the title Messiah. (Deuteronomy 18:15-19; Acts 3:19-23) Many have called this a dream, but Peter, James, and John would not logically all have had exactly the same dream. Jesus himself called what took place a "vision" (Matthew 17:9).


What year did Jesus call Matthew to follow him?

Jesus called Matthew to follow him around the year 30 AD. Matthew was a tax collector when Jesus called him to be one of his disciples.


How is moses and Jesus story's alike?

The similarity between the Jesus of the gospels and Moses in the Old Testament comes about because the gospel authors, most notably the author of Matthew, wrote accounts that emphasised the similarity. They clearly believed that if Jesus could be shown to be similar to Moses then that would confirm his greatness.Some of the evangelists missed opportunities, or did not feel that comparisons between Jesus and Moses were so significant. Whereas Matthew says that the father of Joseph was called Jacob, just as in the Old Testament, Luke says that Joseph's father was called Heli. Raymond E. Brown (An Introduction to the New Testament) says there is little likelihood that either is strictly historical, but Matthew is able to use this small point to create a parallel with Moses. The entire nativity story of Matthew goes on to draw a parallel between Jesus and Moses.John Shelby Spong (Born of a Woman: A Bishop Rethinks the Birth of Jesus) says that Matthew was clearly writing Christian midrash.The significance is that, even today, there are some who look for this evidence and stare in wonder when they see the gospels describing Jesus in these terms. The evangelists were right to believe that similarities between Jesus and Moses would always be highly regarded.


Who would win a three-way fight between Moses and Mohammed and Jesus?

From a Christian perspective, Jesus would win hands down. Moses was merely a prophet; Mohammed was a false prophet; but Jesus is God in human flesh. God always "wins" over a mere mortal. Both the Jewish (Moses) and the Muslim (Mohammed) would say their greatest individual would win.


Why was Jesus berried in a egg?

It was said that gentle jesus was put into the egg by Moses because he would be reborn into a hen and then eaten at a KFC.


Did Matthew model Jesus after Moses Matthew 2 v 20 and Exodus 4 v 19?

Matthew is certainly the most 'Jewish' of all the Gospels with many Old Testament quotations and with Jewish customs teachings and religious controversies.It is possible that Matthew had in mind the similarity with Moses own personal history, and that he knew his audience would recognize this and the obvious fulfillment of the prophecy of Deuteronomy 18:15 where Moses said:The LORD thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken;That said, Matthew could not and of course would not have the material upon which to draw the similarity to people's attention if the historical details of Jesus' earthly existence had not been exactly as they were. So, if the implication is 'Did Matthew make anything up?' the is no, for the simple reason that in the presence of other eyewitnesses he wouldn't have gotten away with it.If the question is asking if he consciously drew the analogy or similarity then it is certainly possible.


Why did Matthew mark luke and john have wise men visit?

The story of the wise men visiting baby Jesus is only found in the Gospel of Matthew, not in Mark, Luke, or John. Matthew likely included this story to show that Jesus was recognized as a king from his infancy and to highlight the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies. Each Gospel writer had different intentions and focused on different aspects of Jesus' life and ministry.


Is there a hidden verse in the genealogy of Jesus in Matthew's Gospel?

There is, of course, no hidden verse in Matthew's genealogy of Jesus, but there is arguably a hidden meaning. Matthew wanted to demonstrate that Jesus was destined for greatness. To do this, he produced a genealogy that demonstrated that there were 14 generations: from Abraham to David; from David to Josiah; from Josiah to Jesus. To do this, he had to ignore 3 kings in the Old Testament and have David in the preceding (as 14) and following (as 1) groups, but not so Josiah. This continued from the time of the Exile to Jesus, but during these generations we have no other genealogy with which to compare Matthew's. Fourteen was regarded as a magic number, and the apparent coincidence that each fourteenth generation in this genealogy was a great man in Jewish history, meant that Jesus would also be a great man. Matthew wrote; ".....in all, forty-two generations (1: 17) but only 41 are listed, so there must be a missing or hidden verse somewhere.


What does the Gospel of Matthew present Jesus as?

In Matthew's nativity story, Jesus is compared with Moses, and Joseph is compared with the Patriarch Joseph of the Old Testament. Herod's "Slaughter of the Innocents" is an intentional parallel with the Pharaoh's slaughter of the infants in the Old Testament. This is not just drama, but an early example of Matthew'suse of the Old Testament to place Jesus firmly in the tradition of the Patriarchs.Elaine Pagels says that Matthew describes Jesus not only as a future king, but a mortal with divine power. But although Matthew does not go as far as to present Jesus as fully divine, as John's Gospel would do some decades later, Jesus' virgin birth is divinely ordained. Matthew uses the genealogy, which Raymond E. Brown (An Introduction to the New Testament) says is unlikely to be literally true, to present Jesus as predestined for greatness, not only because of his supposed descent from both Zorobabel and David, but because of the numerology incorporated in Jesus' ancestry. Throughout the Gospel, frequent references to the Old Testament reinforce the idea of Jesus as predestined for his role as Messiah.The author of Matthew, at 3:1, is unwilling to see Jesus involving himself in a baptism of "repentance for the remission of sins" so that line is omitted. Matthew's Jesus is free from the blemish of sin.


Was Jesus visited by Moses?

No.Additional Answer:When speaking of the physical lifetime of Jesus in the 1st Century A.D., Moses was long dead and buried at the time. However, since Jesus as the Word, was the only God member relating to humans throughout the Bible, then yes, Moses was not only His disciple, but a great Prophet of God - in this case the Word who would become Jesus, the Son of God.