0
Landowners used slaves because they provided a lifetime of labor with minimal upfront costs, while indentured servants had set terms of service and eventually gained their freedom. Slaves were seen as a long-term investment, while indentured servants were a temporary labor solution. Additionally, slaves were often considered property, providing greater control and power to the landowner.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is a reason landowners would rather have slaves then indentured slaves?
Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property and have lifelong servitude, while indentured servants have a set period of servitude and can demand compensation or freedom after their term is complete. This gives landowners more control and long-term labor security with slaves.
What these is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property with no time limit on their labor, while indentured servants have a set term of service and can negotiate for their rights. Slaves also provide a more stable and long-term workforce compared to indentured servants who may leave once their contract is fulfilled. Additionally, slaves can be seen as a permanent source of labor that can be inherited and passed down through generations.
Why would landowners use slaves than indentured servants?
Landowners preferred using slaves over indentured servants because slaves provided a lifetime of unpaid labor, while indentured servants worked under a limited contract. Slaves were considered property and could be bought and sold, providing a stable source of labor. Additionally, slaves were seen as a long-term investment, as their children also became slaves, ensuring a generational workforce.
Why did landowners prefer slaves to indentured servants?
Landowners preferred slaves to indentured servants because slaves were considered a lifetime investment and were seen as property that could be bought, sold, and passed down to future generations. In comparison, indentured servants were only required to work for a set number of years before gaining their freedom, making them a less desirable option for long-term labor needs. Additionally, slaves were seen as a more reliable and permanent source of labor, as they had no legal rights or ability to renegotiate their contracts like indentured servants.
Why would landower rather use slaves than indentured servents?
Landowners preferred using slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a lifelong and inheritable source of labor, while indentured servants could only work for a limited period of time. Slaves were also considered to be a more profitable and reliable workforce as they were seen as a long-term investment. Additionally, the racial hierarchy of the time often justified the use of slaves over indentured servants.
Why did landowners prefer slaves to indentured servants?
Landowners preferred slaves to indentured servants because slaves were considered a lifetime investment and were seen as property that could be bought, sold, and passed down to future generations. In comparison, indentured servants were only required to work for a set number of years before gaining their freedom, making them a less desirable option for long-term labor needs. Additionally, slaves were seen as a more reliable and permanent source of labor, as they had no legal rights or ability to renegotiate their contracts like indentured servants.
Which of these is a good reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Landowners would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a permanent source of labor without a time limit on their service, while indentured servants had contracts that ended after a specific period. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing the landowner with greater control. Additionally, the system of slavery was based on race and allowed for the perpetuation of wealth and power within a specific group.
What is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants.?
Since slavery was for life, I slave provided more years of work. Apex
Why did English colonists adopt slavery?
English colonists adopted slavery in order to meet the labor demands of their profitable industries, such as tobacco and sugar plantations. They saw enslaved Africans as a cheap and abundant source of labor that would help them maximize profits in their colonies. Additionally, they used racist ideologies to justify the enslavement of Africans and perpetuate the system.
What would plantation owners prefer slaves instead of indentured servants?
they coulld use slaves longer
Why would a landowner rather use slaves indentured servants?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
Why would a landowner rather use slaves than indentured servants?
Slaves could be counted on to be more loyal to their masters, and slaves are property and can be bought and sold. Indentured servants are contractually obligated to work for their employer for a fixed amount of time after which they can leave.
In the 13 original english colonies indentured servants were placed by african slaves for all the following reasons except?
In the 13 original English colonies, indentured servants were replaced by African slaves because unlike slaves, servants were guaranteed to be eventually released from bondage, and therefore slaves would provide renewable sources of labor.
What does indentured servants do?
indentured servants worked for a period of time without pay
How did the plantation system and the lack of indentured servants affect the status of Africans in America?
The plantations system and the lack of indentured servants in America affected the status of Africans in America because Africans where slaves and the would work eternally unlike indentured servants who only worked temporarily.
How did the plantation system and lack of indentured servants affect the status of Africans in America?
The plantations system and the lack of indentured servants in America affected the status of Africans in America because Africans where slaves and the would work eternally unlike indentured servants who only worked temporarily.
How did the plantation system and the lack indentured servants affect the status of African in America?
The plantations system and the lack of indentured servants in America affected the status of Africans in America because Africans where slaves and the would work eternally unlike indentured servants who only worked temporarily.
